2007-03-20 14:05:07 · 10 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
unlike Iraq, Bush could start a war where there's no possible association with national interests.
Find another Bosnia, for example. The kind of war the libs are always clamoring for.
2007-03-20 14:16:56 · update #1
No. Their pathological hatred for George W Bush would not allow that. If President Bush cured cancer, they would hold vigils for the cancer cells.
2007-03-20 14:13:54 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 14⤊ 1⤋
it's nice to see that Republicans can't fight a humanitarian war...just to fight a humanitarian war... but have to have a politican reason to do it... like to get "good PR"
but ACTUALLY I think he would have had a MUCH easier time in Iraq (at least as far as support goes) if he focused on the humanitarian part, more than the WMD when we first invaded...
if he just said "we think they MAY have WMD... not sure... but we need to do something about the humanitarian situation"... when in reality... the humanitarian part was very much in the far background of the causes for war...
I think they would be a little suspicous of his motivations... judging by past experience if he did it now...
2007-03-20 21:24:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you crazy?
Do you want Bush to start a war to look good?
People should die so we can like Bush?
Never going to happen. You must be nuts!
Until Bush is out of office the Libs will never lay off.
2007-03-20 21:13:52 · answer #3 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm assuming you mean public relations and not Puerto Rico.
We have no need to start a humanitarian war, we should be involved in dealing with the acts of genocide in Darfur. And yes that might help.
2007-03-20 21:10:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not too sure about that one, a nice healthy humanitarian war?
How about if he was able to end a war?
2007-03-20 21:14:24 · answer #5 · answered by mattzcoz 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what kind of sense does that make? they would still be pissed because its not about what the war is about. its the fact that its a war. although the war going on right now really has NO point, and its a waste of time and innocent lives.
2007-03-20 21:11:43 · answer #6 · answered by ashley h 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush doesn't have a humanitarian bone in his body all he cares about is oil, war, oil, war, oil and more war.
2007-03-20 21:12:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
he did start a humanitarian war in iraq, brainiac...wtf? let me ask you something, at what point did the war for iraqis become a war against them....over 60,000 dead civilians...way to go george....
2007-03-20 21:10:29 · answer #8 · answered by dude s 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"a humanitarian war for PR" ?? How dumb is that?
2007-03-20 21:09:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be the same list of gripes if we were in Darfur.
2007-03-20 21:08:29 · answer #10 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋