English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Id got to go with Kane. Abyss is just a cheap cross between Kane and Mandkind. So for that matter Abyss vs Mankind? who gets the win there. I still go with Mankind. He was more sadistic. I do like the black hole slam though. Cool move.

2007-03-20 14:02:25 · 11 answers · asked by Jayson Kane 7 in Sports Wrestling

11 answers

Kane because as you said that Abyss's crossover between Kane and Mankind. The TNA storyline team should give some kind of new never seen before kind of persona to Abyss because Abyss's has got some talent and he can make it on his own in the business so then why?

P.S. TNA should just drop the storyline between Sting and Abyss because they are copying the Undertaker-Kane storyline 8 years back! and believe me stuff like that could only possibly will go on to further harm the potential of Chris Parks aka Abyss and the legendary career of Sting. seriously, Sting don't have to come out acting like the Undertaker. No disrespect to anyone, Sting has already earned a legendary spot in the business and didn't had to act out like somebody else in the past and have always come on the top of food chain and I don't need to explain further about his career, everybody knows it so TNA just needs to find out some new character roles and personas for these two.

2007-03-20 14:16:55 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

Kane, I constantly needed to be certain this tournament there the two very comparable yet I see Kane having the common benefit over Abyss, I say Kane might Chokeslam Abyss for the win so i might see Kane beating Abyss in an intensive tournament.

2016-10-01 06:09:47 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I would have to go with Kane and Mankind mostly because of experience. I agree that Abyss's character is a ripoff of Kane and Mankind, but I do think he is a good wrestler and I am actually surprised that Vince never tried to steal him away from TNA because we all know how much Vince likes big men. I would enjoy watching Kane-vs.-Abyss, I think it would be a great match. I hope that answers your question.

2007-03-20 14:16:41 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas C 4 · 0 0

If we were talking about the Kane that debut in the WWE 10 years ago than I would have to go with Kane, because he was the first true monster of the WWE.( Think back to Wrestlemania 14, against Undertaker), but nowadays I would have to go with Abyss. Kane has lost what makes him special, and I think its due to losing the mask.

2007-03-20 14:13:28 · answer #4 · answered by mo33196 2 · 0 0

i say the big red machine. then Abyss will have eyes remove from his eye sockets and put it in a jar and finish the job by impaling the hook into Abyss's heart. Kane is a force to be reckoned with

2007-03-20 15:53:28 · answer #5 · answered by Dawgma-Texan for Life. TX Pride. 5 · 0 0

Kane. Kane can beat anyone is a way better wrestler and future hall of famer he's going to kill Khali at Wrestlemania 23.

2007-03-20 14:12:57 · answer #6 · answered by Naman B 3 · 0 0

Kane because he's a better wrestler pure and simple.

2007-03-20 14:19:27 · answer #7 · answered by The Man from Nowhere 3 · 0 0

Kane is basically a big jobber...he never beats anyone good anymore...

2007-03-20 14:14:57 · answer #8 · answered by Matt M 1 · 0 0

Kane

Abyss is all tough and scary because he has never faced anything like himself. If he faced the Big Red Monster, he'd be screwed.

2007-03-20 14:10:28 · answer #9 · answered by Rain. 6 · 0 0

omg man....abyss is nothing comparing to kane.....kane is a legend.....great wrestler,great gimmick.....sure kane would win

2007-03-20 14:06:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers