They, the liberals, attack him about darn near everything. And this does not seem right. It seems that they never gave him a chance; like theres nothing he can do right nor will do right. As a matter of fact, they will have you believe he is bad person with malicious intentions. Suffice it to say, liberal media has possibly brainwashed many into believing that President Bush does nothing right, and that everything he touches is tainted. If he cured cancer tomorrow, liberals would find something to blame him for. But let me tell you this: If there is another terrorist attack you can bet liberals will be sorry for handicapping victory in Iraq. What does it take for liberals to finally get off President Bush's back?
2007-03-20 13:57:50 · 20 answers · asked by Gary 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He has a chance of neither.. so your question unfortunately is redundant.
2007-03-20 14:00:26 · answer #1 · answered by Blessed 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
this question is dumb. If Bush got here across a therapy for many cancers, it would over shadow is failed rules. He could be hailed as between the final minds of our time, if not background. He might win the Nobel Peace Prize, among different scientific prizes. yet that's relatively not likely. How ought to you anticipate a c usual individual to end some thing the final minds interior the international could not? he's not a solid chief, i don't see how he could be a large inventor. you will possibly desire to placed up the rationalization why you help Bush quite than bashing liberals. Its unlike we don't have a reason for not helping him. i don't help him for his rules, not because of the fact I hate him. i don't hate him. i don't even comprehend him, yet i comprehend he has been a undesirable chief. he's not even a solid conservative. he's the worst of the two worlds. a minimum of maximum conservatives are in touch approximately our defecit. he's doing away with straightforward rights, and he spends extra funds than we've. I under no circumstances nevertheless havent discovered how he spends extra funds than any president ever, yet he nevertheless manages to decrease taxes. loopy huh. easily i comprehend how. He purely spends carelessy with none regard as to how we pays for it, reason he's conscious somebody else after him would be there to freshen up the mess. He does not prefer to handle any of our real problems, he purely desires to push them off on somebody else.
2016-10-19 05:13:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are very obviously someone who hasn't had their life altered by this president or this war. nations can't go to war against ideals. you can not bomb or kill and idea with conventional armies (in my case marines). i am sorry but you just don't know the real world. remember one thing uneducated one....there were no terrorist in iraq before we landed or WMD. i will get off his back when he smartens up and stop blatantly lying to the likes of people like you!
btw george bush isn't a doctor or scientist. how would he cure cancer? exactly!
stop beating the war drums until you are ready and willing to die for a war that you were lied to about!
2007-03-28 10:53:04 · answer #3 · answered by skierfrmct 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here is my personal evaluation of what I term a " Liberally ". It is a single individual who believes with out a doubt that his/her intelligence is superior to others, and that what-ever idea they have is 'extremely important'. And Lord forbid, if they might be incorrect, the idea was someone Else's !! They ALWAYS find problems with Christians, especially Born-Again Christians. They endorse Gay Equality, Abortion and it's tentacle's, no Police unless they are nice; and Soldiers that aren't able to kill their enemies because they have a right to voice their opinion.!!!! Not being rude, but, it really sounds like someone has spiked the Kool-Aid !! My suggestion to help them all out is to send them on a tour of their favorite countries, starting with Cuba, then Veneszuela, Iran, North Korea, etc., etc. God Bless !!
2007-03-28 06:30:17 · answer #4 · answered by fuzzypetshop 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As you can see from the answers, there would be no let up in the attacks. Liberals are pathetic little children who want their mommies to kiss their little hurt.
2007-03-26 00:27:10 · answer #5 · answered by edward m 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because Nancy Pelosi and Billary Clinton would still want to sit in the oval office. Most that they do now is lies or misrepresentations to discredit him, what would change?
2007-03-27 10:06:56 · answer #6 · answered by Charles S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His War on Terror is proven to have INCREASED TERRORISM throughout the world.
He can barely put two sentences together coherently - so pretty doubtful he will be able to cure cancer.
What victory in Iraq ????????????
2007-03-28 03:54:01 · answer #7 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
liberals are handicapping victory in iraq? You my friend are watching way too much fox and need to get informed.
2007-03-20 14:08:59 · answer #8 · answered by Interested 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
there is nothing that will change their mindset as they feel he never won the election(you know two terms?) so next it will be his fault for the tectonic plates shifting and causing earthquakes hehe
2007-03-28 05:35:53 · answer #9 · answered by mike_dooley49 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. They would hold vigils for the terrorists & the cancer cells.
2007-03-20 14:24:09 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If bush really wanted to stop terrorism he wouldn't be in Iraq
2007-03-20 14:03:22 · answer #11 · answered by amnkeefe 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋