4 reasons the supreme courts power to share public policy is limited?

Answer 1

Is hurricanes mad by GOD or man?

Answer 2

Fourth, because the decisions of the Supreme Court can be reversed by a later Court examining a similar issue. The decisions are not set in stone.

Answer 3

I assume you mean "shape" public policy.

First, because of the Article III "cases or controversies" doctrine, which prohibits the court from addressing matters outside the scope of specific cases or claims.

Second, because the Supreme Court is limited to issues of federal law, or arising under the federal Constitution. It cannot interpret matters that are purely state law or state constitutional issues.

Third, because aside from federal constitutional issues, the Court's holdings are limited to interpreting statutes passed by Congress, and Congress can change the statute at any later time rendering any non-constitutional decision obsolete.

Answer 4

a million) Restraintist judges do not bypass ruling that should shape ANY public coverage as ultimate as they are able to. 2) No potential of the handbag($) 3) No potential of the sword(military) 4) they don't look to be interior the generic public eye, or voted in by means of the individuals subsequently they aern't impression by means of constituants to shape coverage, as meant by means of the framers.