As an American, are you satisified with the presidents response on the attorney firings where he is not allowing Rove or other key staff members to testify under oath (Just off the record?) Aside from hiding something, what possible reason could he have to justify this course of action?
2007-03-20 13:32:40 · 7 answers · asked by mark 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
It isn't the firings, it is that they were told to press charges against democrats, right before the election that were totally unsubstantiated. When they refused they were fired.
They know Nuremberg, you don't follow an illegal order
2007-03-20 13:42:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes. It's a mole hill made into a mountain. AG set priorities for them and they ignored them. I would have fired them too. Other performance issues are irrelevant - they didn't follow legal instructions. There's an old saying about being careful which swords one chooses to fall on.
2007-03-20 15:49:06 · answer #2 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not satisfied with ANYTHING bush and cronies have done to date. The only reason he could possibly have for doing this is the hope that it will increase his rating.
2007-03-20 14:09:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Someone needs to get BUSH to testify under oath.
2007-03-20 13:43:05 · answer #4 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Who can trust what GWB tells the American public from his actions of the past I have little faith in what he says.
2007-03-21 01:01:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. I'm a Republican, and Bush is the worst President ever. A pretty powerful statement being that he took office right after Slick WIllie.
2007-03-20 13:38:08 · answer #6 · answered by irish_giant 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
if he allowed that, the trail would lead right into his office.
2007-03-20 14:11:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋