NO i WOULD NOT NEITHER PLACES BECAUSE;
I am fine where I am
I have no reason to live there
I don't have to make such decisions
I don't know the places well, but from little that I do, is enough not to want to live there.
2007-03-20 13:26:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by a 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd live in Hong Kong because a) I'll probably never get another chance, b) I like the ocean, and c) if it was unbearable I'd be able to say 'well, I can always try Huntsville'. But if I lived in Huntsville I'd never be able to say that, and I like options.
2007-03-20 20:56:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by a 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would livein Huntsville because
1. It's close to home
My family is in Georgia, so I would be close to my family
2. Same language
I wouldn't have to learn a new language or possibly hire an interpreter
3.Closer to my price range
I am on a budget, so moving somwhere so far away is not an option, and housing is more affordable there
2007-03-20 20:33:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Meredith G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Huntsville. I have one reason. I wouldnt live where I dont speak the language. I know how irritating it is dealing with people HERE that dont speak English.
2007-03-20 20:32:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by plainfieldcletusblue 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Huntsville
Further away from the bird flu
My parents are here
HK overpopulation, no open space, no privacy (BEEN THERE AND DON'T WANT TO GO BACK)
2007-03-24 11:00:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by lindalousmile 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd live in Walla Walla Washington.
2007-03-20 20:24:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Scotty Doesnt Know 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't live either place by choice.
2007-03-20 20:29:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋