.....wouldnt they, in an essence, be in your face?
2007-03-20 13:05:09 · 5 answers · asked by ? 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
maybe not so much "in face" as in front of you.
2007-03-20 13:16:56 · update #1
They would only be in your face (so to speak) if you heard them talking about you in a negative way.
2007-03-20 13:13:20 · answer #1 · answered by NeNe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I care not for the slings and arrows slung by cowards but rather to gaze, dream like, upon the curious road that layeth before me.
2007-03-20 20:49:15 · answer #2 · answered by al b 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
so long as you don't hear it right to your face, why not?
if someone cannot express himself ardently infront of your face, that means to say that you're more superior than that person in all perspective that they can't even look at you while talking, take it that way.
2007-03-20 20:18:18 · answer #3 · answered by oscar c 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I see what you mean... it's an affront, an invasion of personal space, privacy etc. so it's more like they are filling your reality with the sight of their muck.
2007-03-20 22:17:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. How do you figure?
2007-03-20 20:12:55 · answer #5 · answered by plainfieldcletusblue 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋