Could it be that she is the blame for the Katrina response and knows it?
2007-03-20 12:51:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Bingo! X marks the spot, you have won the door prize. She tried passing the buck and blaming the Federal Government. In the end the people that live in Louisiana know the truth, it was her responsibility to act and she failed.
2007-03-20 12:58:37 · answer #1 · answered by Mother 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She had no clue what was going on during and right after Katina, so she blamed others. She has no chance of getting reelected but sometimes the voters are voting uninformed who knows, what the result would of been. Now how about the corrupt mayor of N.O. When will the people wise up?? The local government must step up. Why should us/me pay for the welfare city of N.O. and the corrupt policies of the state and city.
2007-03-20 13:11:52 · answer #2 · answered by retired_afmil 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The way Katrina was handled
2007-03-20 12:56:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
She was in defiance of the Bush Admin. and would not cooperate. She tried to side step it but facts are facts.
The people of La. know who's at fault.
I expected Bush to get the blame for it because no matter what happens people love to bash him. His shoulders have to hold the weight of all that happens, poor guy.
2007-03-20 12:57:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Let's not forget the Mayor of New Orleans he failed them as well.
2007-03-20 14:29:17 · answer #5 · answered by jason s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, now if we can get that fool of a mayor to follow her lead.
2007-03-20 13:26:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably because she knows she wouldn't be re-elected.
2007-03-20 12:58:28 · answer #7 · answered by First Lady 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋