2007-03-20 12:50:53 · 8 answers · asked by PUBLIC CORRUPTION 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Absolutely false, remember it was Harriet Meyers his supreme court nominee that was his personal attorney
2007-03-20 12:55:15 · answer #1 · answered by prusa1237 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of you spelled his last name wrong! It is Gonzales with an S at the end,. So what if he was? Hispanics if they climb a bit they get pushed down again! I tell u something else , Bush has given more opportunities to blacks and Hispanics than any other president! I may not agree with him on everything , but I respect him and tell it like it is! so there! Adios banana!
2007-03-20 12:57:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He wasn't his personal attorney, but he was the White House Counsel to President Bush.
The White House Counsel advises the president on all legal issues.
2007-03-20 12:54:08 · answer #3 · answered by worldthoughts 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
False
2007-03-20 12:52:30 · answer #4 · answered by candy8 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Who cares? It is the President's prerogative to fire any Federal judges he wants to, for any reason. Hell, Bill Clinton fired a hell of a lot more of them than Bush (or Gonzalez) did.
2007-03-20 12:54:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely TRUE
2007-03-20 12:53:46 · answer #6 · answered by Stormy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
True!
2007-03-20 12:54:54 · answer #7 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
True and sadly, he was a lapdog then too.
2007-03-20 12:52:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋