And please, give real answers, no insults or rhetoric.
2007-03-20 12:45:33 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Because they have no reason to testify. The President can fire who he chooses and Dems have no business interfering!!!
2007-03-20 12:55:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
If they gave answers under oath, they could be held accountable for lying. Scooter Libby was convicted for perjury--lying under oath.
2007-03-20 19:51:50 · answer #2 · answered by worldthoughts 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would imagine that after Libby's conviction, his staff would be quite hesitant to lie under oath.
2007-03-20 19:51:58 · answer #3 · answered by William S 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
That is a privilege that presidents have always enjoyed and for Bush to give in would set a precedent that cost all future presidents this privilege, which they should have.
2007-03-20 20:01:55 · answer #4 · answered by jim h 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
He remembers what happened to Clinton.
2007-03-20 20:19:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Becasue they have now told so many lies over the last 6 years they have forgotten what the truth is and can then be held accountable for it legally.
2007-03-20 19:53:09 · answer #6 · answered by region50 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Because they were lying before and risk lying and prison time if they commit perjury.
2007-03-20 19:57:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Because he realizes that if they did, they'd all be, subsequently, indicted for perjury.
2007-03-20 21:23:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hiding something or cover up ????
Hummmmmmmmm
2007-03-20 19:53:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
because we'll find Gonzales guilty....and bush will have to admit a mistake
2007-03-20 19:52:32 · answer #10 · answered by Departed 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋