I suck when it comes to sports but I do reasonably well in academics. I would rather get a scholarship based on academics at least I would have a chance ha ha.
2007-03-20 12:12:20 · 24 answers · asked by 12Grey14 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I was better at academics-was a total klutz at sports. Graduated near the top of my class in high school and got a scholarship to pay for college and nursing school.
2007-03-20 12:17:27 · answer #1 · answered by Country girl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Academics
2007-03-20 12:17:00 · answer #2 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am more proficient in academics, although in my younger years I did reasonably well at sports like track and volleyball. I never really had that much of an interest in sports, but if I had, I think I could have done well. I was more of a ballet person.
2007-03-20 12:17:03 · answer #3 · answered by comet girl...DUCK! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Academics, by far. The only reason I got on the sports field was because I was the photographer for the newspaper and yearbook. . .
2007-03-20 12:17:28 · answer #4 · answered by Walking Man 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Academics. I agree with you on the scholarship idea - that's how I got through college.
2007-03-20 14:58:17 · answer #5 · answered by Cookie777 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually it was sports. I could have been much better in academics, but I underachieved there because of my proficiency in sports. It didn't hurt me, though. I still eventually went to college and got my degree. Would you like fries with that?
Just kidding.
M
2007-03-20 12:20:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i am bad at sports but good at academics
2007-03-20 12:20:42 · answer #7 · answered by Mrs.Beckford 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Academics by far! But am not too shabby at sports either --- in my younger days, of course!
2007-03-20 12:18:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
academics. i always get strait A's (ok and a few B's) and im only good at one or two sports.
2007-03-20 12:23:12 · answer #9 · answered by Clairebear. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are activities all there is in existence? even even though it ought to sometimes look so, the international is a little extra complicated. there is artwork, there is play, there is pals and family individuals, and there is the religious edge of existence. we'd desire to spend time and income skills suitable for all of those areas of our lives. as quickly as we plan our lives, we'd desire to continuously plan in each and each of those areas, inclusive of placing targets in each and each. on an identical time as now and back, it must be conceivable to combine 2 or extra of those areas, as a minister combines the religious with the artwork, for many human beings, those are all separate areas. So the respond on your question isn't any. i think of you already knew that, or you does not have asked the question.
2016-10-19 05:01:19 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋