We all know that the war in Iraq has claimed more than 650,000 Iraqi civilian lives, lasted already four years (longer than US involvement in World War 2), and has been proven to not be beneficial to anyone in anyway. Why are we in Iraq when North Korea is testing nuclear weapons and they pose a much greater threat?
2007-03-20 11:59:35 · 7 answers · asked by superisa2001lbs 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Better yet, why are we in Iraq when Osama is still at large?
2007-03-20 12:07:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel it is becasue we have to be much more careful with North Korea the Iraq. It's hard to say this but, the North Korean Army far outnumbers the US Army and I think our commanders know that. They could make life difficult just by force in numbers. I do believe the ratio is something like 1 American soldier to every 100 North Korean soldiers.
2007-03-20 12:11:16 · answer #2 · answered by henasty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Has North Korea got any oil?
Have they got any stuff we want at all??
Nope.
So it's not necessary for Bush to "liberate" them, is it? We only need to make countries "safe for democracy" if they've got stuff we want to put on our credit cards.
2007-03-20 14:38:44 · answer #3 · answered by rhrjruk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they have Nuclear weapons. You have to deal with countries that have them differently than countries that are planning to build them.
2007-03-20 12:35:37 · answer #4 · answered by Homeless in Phoenix 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
north korea has no oil.
2007-03-20 14:24:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ever seen 100 million screaming chinese coming at you ?
2007-03-20 12:05:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Is this a joke?
2007-03-20 12:06:56 · answer #7 · answered by Becky 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋