they were main eventers in TNA and mid-carders in WWE
2007-03-20 11:57:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
TNA is more likely to give them the push they so rightly deserve. TNA is also more likely to let these guys wrestle they way they want to so the wrestling world can see what these guys can really do.
2007-03-20 12:03:47 · answer #1 · answered by HULK RULES!! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
jeff hardy no because he likes wwe more than tna and by the way he really was more of a midcarder in tna as for sabu hell ya i dont know why he moved in the first place
2007-03-20 12:06:16 · answer #2 · answered by jonluke s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jeff was starting to be main eventer in WWE before he started screwing up and got released. Now he has to prove himself again. He's better than ever. He'll be a main eventer again. Sabu is better on ECW because of his fighting style. That is a better outlet for him.
2007-03-20 12:07:52 · answer #3 · answered by Desperate for Answers 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. TNA is way too dramatic but in a boring way. Hardy and Sabu are prime reasons those two brands are still airing today because of what they did for those brands in the past
2007-03-20 12:04:03 · answer #4 · answered by DarthNick 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For Sabu YEAH, but Jeff Hardy is doing great in WWE ...
2007-03-20 12:00:21 · answer #5 · answered by Triple H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO. Sabu is doing great with the Originals in ECW. and Jeff Hardy is doing great in RAW.
2007-03-20 12:01:56 · answer #6 · answered by k 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sabu is my fav wrestler with jeff and i reckon that sabu needs to move bak 2 tna for his own credibility
2007-03-20 12:41:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yeah I agree with Triple H for Sabu it was great
2007-03-20 12:02:07 · answer #8 · answered by RVD-RKA 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA is a better alternative for everyone.
2007-03-21 06:19:20 · answer #9 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Id rather have jeff onsmackdown.
2007-03-20 12:17:37 · answer #10 · answered by undertaker dead man walking 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋