English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hint: Whitewater

2007-03-20 11:49:07 · 13 answers · asked by mr_methane_gasman 3 in Politics & Government Politics

So he would'nt have to lie to them during his federal grand jury indictments.

2007-03-20 11:52:39 · update #1

13 answers

He had to fire all of them to hide the fact that he needed to get rid of the attorney in Arkansas who was investigating him. They were hot on his trail.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110009784

Anyone who says Clinton's predecessors did the same thing is a liar.
In fact, the dismissals were unprecedented: Previous Presidents, including Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter, had both retained holdovers from the previous Administration and only replaced them gradually as their tenures expired. This allowed continuity of leadership within the U.S. Attorney offices during the transition

2007-03-20 11:52:19 · answer #1 · answered by charbatch 4 · 2 2

You people make me concern for a manner forward for our u . s .. The selective memory on the two facets of the aisle is merely surprising. ok, some info right here. First, it rather is easy prepare for a clean President to replace the old President's appointees, which might incorporate those judges. So there is not any longer something unusual approximately what Clinton did. i've got faith Reagan did the comparable factor with all of Carter's appointed judges. i've got faith Carter did the comparable with all of Ford's. while the White domicile adjustments events, it rather is an basic factor. this is merely no longer elementary to do it in the midst of an administration, and it is not elementary to do it because of the fact the folk in that place are not shifting rapid adequate on investigations into Democratic election suggestions in the run-as much as a countrywide election, which seems to be the case that those judges are making. even if there is any certainty to their claims, i don't be attentive to. and those of you whose brains for sure have holes in them seem to think of that Clinton never have been given hounded for something he did. You seem to have forgotten that Clinton have been given slammed with the help of the media for firing the excellent White domicile return and forth team. You seem to have forgotten that each and every of the 1993 WTC bombers have been arrested and convicted. You seem to have forgotten that once the Embassy bombings, we released missiles at al Quida training bases. (probably pointless, yet he did something.) You seem to forget approximately that the Yemeni government rounded up and improsoned the united statesCole bombers. You seem to forget approximately that there are greater procedures to wrestle international terrorism than with the 82nd Airborne. You seem to have forgotten those impeachment courtroom circumstances and Ken megastar and 'that woman' that he 'never had intercourse with'. Clinton replace into the main chicken-dogged President i've got ever time-commemorated, and that i lived with the aid of Watergate. So i might recommend which you attempt to get something to plug up the holes on your heads that are curiously permitting your brains to leak out, different than that i've got faith it is your mouth this is the subject.

2016-10-19 04:59:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

As dozens of people have already noted, it's common practice when a new president takes office to get rid of political appointees, especially when the other party was in power for a dozen years prior to that.

As for Whitewater, everything I've found indicates that the federal prosecutor in Arkansas had already dropped the investigation in the fall of 1992, well before the March 1993 firings. If you have evidence to the contrary, then please let us know.

Or just email me privately. I'm always happy to review my conclusions based on additional evidence.

2007-03-20 11:52:33 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3 3

It had nothing to do with anything other than it is the tradition. His predecessor did the same thing and so did his. I get so sick of the childish way people behave when you lay the truth on them about their guy. Well so and so did it. We're not talking about so and so. Johnny why did you pull suzie's hair. Jimmy did it. The question was not answered but a feeble attempt to deflect the arrows of truth.

2007-03-20 11:54:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

LOL, you didn't have to waste 5 points for that. It's all over the Internet.

2007-03-20 14:44:29 · answer #5 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0 0

Many presidents fire US attorneys and replace them with thier own choices immediately after taking office. Bush did this himself with NO OBJECTIONS from Democrats.

It's when you do it mid-term and then your attorney general lies about it when you have a problem.

2007-03-20 11:54:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I made him do it...you see I am really Hillary Clinton ...I have a penis and its so large..how large is it...its as big as a china mins left arm...

2007-03-20 11:53:52 · answer #7 · answered by xjim7 2 · 3 2

I would explain it to you, but you wouldn't be able to grasp the facts, truth, logic and reality!

2007-03-20 11:57:11 · answer #8 · answered by Tom B 3 · 0 2

so he could have a bunch of left wing liberals in place. why else?

2007-03-20 12:00:11 · answer #9 · answered by afterflakes 4 · 1 2

once again fox news feeds you only what they want you to hear and you eat it up ....you got the salad and the soup but your forgetting the meat and veg buddy .

2007-03-20 11:53:09 · answer #10 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers