FROM ME, a big fat NOOOOOOOOOO
2007-03-20 11:47:22 · 38 answers · asked by ms vicci pollard 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
NO! he is a rare species of bear! they need every single one of their species to survive! would they (animal rights 'people') say the same thing about an endangered panda being hand reared? or even bengal tiger cubs being hand reared? what are these 'people' on?
2007-03-20 11:58:26 · answer #1 · answered by JULIE B 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How can you kill something so cute? They said that it would be better for it than being raised as a domestic animal. No it won't. It'll be dead.
They said that the other bears would kill it if you tried to put it back in with them later. Fine, it'll be dead either way but at least it will have had some life and will die as nature intended, by being mauled by other bears, not by being shot in the head.
2007-03-20 12:09:40 · answer #2 · answered by elflaeda 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How many animals have been hand raised and used for animal conservation purposed?
I think that saying the only solution is to kill the cub is a crock.
2007-03-20 11:49:45 · answer #3 · answered by FaZizzle 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I cant believe I am agreeing with you Vicki but I agree! ..the zoo keepers see no reason for this little guy to be put to sleep .He is a rare and beautiful creature who could contribute to the continuation of the species in the future.
2007-03-20 11:51:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
It's tough to say, and please hear me out on this one. I think that nature, in large part, should be allowed to govern itself. I live in a place where forest fires are never allowed to happen even though it would be very healthful to let them occur now and again. I definitely believe in animal rights and allowing them their territory back so that they can proliferate. But in a situation like this one, they should let the polar bear live. I am for animal rights, but every once in a while it involves making tough decisions. I think that the right one was made in this case.
2007-03-20 11:51:52 · answer #5 · answered by BRAINS! 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
what do you mean?
a polar bear was killed by some animal rights members?
sounds contradictory.
so confused. and my hands hurt for typing. no! carpal tunnel ... go away
2007-03-20 15:53:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No!!!
No!!!
No!!!
No!!!
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! Only a heartless moronic @rsehole would want to murder this cute little cub. In theory, does this mean all orphans should be murdered too??? xxx
2007-03-20 12:25:49 · answer #7 · answered by Joanne W 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Nooooo, it is wrong and just stupid. Poor little bear. They'll be extinct soon as it is, why kill 'em off early? Disgusting.
2007-03-20 11:54:01 · answer #8 · answered by Wildamberhoney 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Definite no ,let's put them in with mummy polar bear and see what happens shall we ?
2007-03-20 11:51:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
A definite big fat noooooooooooo from me too, good news is he is going to be safe they changed their minds.
2007-03-20 12:25:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋