2007-03-20 11:45:29 · 12 answers · asked by PragmaticMan 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It would be cool if the Aliens came down and hauled the freaks off to another planet.
There would be less Democrat Votes next election.
2007-03-20 11:53:12 · answer #1 · answered by wolf 6 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Oh, I don't now, I think the right-wing conspiracy nuts have their place. It keeps sane individuals like you and I on our toes and our minds sharp.
The two things that the 9/11 Truthists or other rabble have never been able to answer (especially with the cadre of "experts" they always seem to pool) is a) explain how the physics of a aluminum tube full of fuel (i.e. an airliner) won't cause the kind of damage thousands of people saw on 9/11 and b) how in the hell the US gov't and its spindoctors could keep a quaint little conspiracy like that a secret. I mean, honestly, there is always a leak.
2007-03-20 18:59:59 · answer #2 · answered by Hotwad 980 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
People if you want to know what really happened on 911 then watch MARTIAL LAW 911: RISE OF THE POLICE STATE! It has ALL the proof you will need and things that were said that leaked. The reason why people don't know the truth is because they don't want to. I've told so many people to watch it; that it has all the proof we and they say "no i believe what i want". wooooooow
2007-03-20 19:05:52 · answer #3 · answered by L3monDr0p 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Its scary to think what this nation could accomplish with these defective mutants removed from the gene pool. Many self select themselves out either through being gay or just being terminal bed wetting mommas boys.
2007-03-20 18:51:08 · answer #4 · answered by mr_methane_gasman 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
It would most likely drop because these are the folks who read books, watch documentaries, and investigate the crime.
The folks who are blindly following the governments story and get their daily dose of pop culture from Fox News or CNN don't bother investigating, reading, or thinking. All that is done for them.
2007-03-20 18:51:30 · answer #5 · answered by trevor22in 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Be careful.I've already got a violation today for pointing out to one of them that they were posting the same thing over and over .
2007-03-20 18:49:47 · answer #6 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Conspiracy theorists are more intelligent and literate than the average person. They're just insane.
2007-03-20 18:53:27 · answer #7 · answered by Pearl Jam 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The conspiracy nutheads should not procreate.
If they don't we may see logic and reasoning come back in 1 generation.
I can hope.
2007-03-20 18:50:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
If Y/A Cons were taken out, they would soar to record highs!
2007-03-20 18:48:51 · answer #9 · answered by Tom B 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Col. George Nelson, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts authority. 34-year Air Force career.
Essay: "In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases the precise cause of the accident. ...
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history." http://www.physics911.net
Editor's note: For more information on the impact at the Pentagon, see General Stubblebine, Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski, Major Rokke, Capt. Wittenberg, and Steve DeChiaro.
Member: Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice Association Statement: "Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the September 11, 2001 attacks."
Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force veteran.
Contributor to 9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out 8/23/06: Account of Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski, Pentagon employee and eyewitness to the events at the Pentagon on 9/11. "I believe the Commission failed to deeply examine the topic at hand, failed to apply scientific rigor to its assessment of events leading up to and including 9/11, failed to produce a believable and unbiased summary of what happened, failed to fully examine why it happened, and even failed to include a set of unanswered questions for future research. ...
It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics. ...
There was a dearth of visible debris on the relatively unmarked [Pentagon] lawn, where I stood only minutes after the impact. Beyond this strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense [Donald Rumsfeld], who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a "missile".
... I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon. ... all of us staring at the Pentagon that morning were indeed looking for such debris, but what we expected to see was not evident.
The same is true with regard to the kind of damage we expected. ... But I did not see this kind of damage. Rather, the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter. Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight.
The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon.
... More information is certainly needed regarding the events of 9/11 and the events leading up to that terrible day."
Editor's note: For more information on the impact at the Pentagon, see General Stubblebine, Colonel Nelson, Major Rokke, Capt. Wittenberg, and Steve DeChiaro.
Bio: http://militaryweek.com/
2007-03-20 18:48:41 · answer #10 · answered by dstr 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋