For 6 years Bush operated without fear of any oversite by Congress. If Republicans were still in control of the House would they have just ignored the firings of the US Attorneys?
2007-03-20 11:43:19 · 12 answers · asked by itsdabigbadwolf 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They stand to loose quite a bit with Gonzales out of the picture. After 9/11, the American Right has gotten away with so much, the FBI overstepped its boundaries, Bush launched a pointless war (Iraq), air travel has become a pain in the ***. Why do you think President Bush hasn't done anything to end the war in Iraq? Truth be told, America has accomplished most of it's objective in the region, so has Britain. Time to go home. Why not? Well, as I said before, the Republican right stands to loose soo much over leaving Iraq.
2007-03-20 11:48:26 · answer #1 · answered by Hotwad 980 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I watch area of this Glenn Beck deal n Fox and that choose it is often on there made 3 great factors approximately not following the form, that we would desire to get rid of the two occasion government gadget that are in basic terms a like and likewise bypass to the state legislatures and have 2/3ths of them bypass to the feds and tell them to get rid of the tax gadget in place. beck then suggested to diminish off the money and the politicians might freak out and say "they're taking our toys away". that's exciting that the Tea occasion deal popped up after 8 years of wholesale spending, however the democrats have a great equipped in base as government help is worth this is weight in gold. human beings say that's worth $60,000 a year once you put in the nutrition stamps, assistance housing, and well-being care. Why might absolutely everyone want a minimum salary interest. you may might desire to make approximately that plenty to break even or perhaps working 2 jobs you may in no way come close to to$60,000. Republicans have extremely not been like they're think to be merely like the Democrats tha voted for the conflict, the only time they might desire to have caught to the weapons. Have a great 2009!
2016-11-27 01:31:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did Janet Reno ignore the Clinton debacle when Clinton ordered the stooge of an Attorney General to fire all 93 federal prosecutors?
2007-03-20 11:56:05 · answer #3 · answered by mr_methane_gasman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certainly, They have ignored the Constitution for six years:
So the FBI violated the rights of 145,000 innocent Americans.
So they fired anyone who wouldn't file false charges right before an election,
After all Gonzales is the one who doesn't believe detainees have rights. Iguess that includes Democrats too.
2007-03-20 11:50:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure they would. Just like the Democrat congress ignored the 137 Government Attorneys Clinton fired
2007-03-20 11:47:51 · answer #5 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Of course they would ignore the mess. They did all the other stuff Bush has been getting away with. Of course, that why Bush has steam coming from his ears now. He knows his "party" is over. Turn out the lights!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-20 12:30:11 · answer #6 · answered by cwigg 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For sure. Bush ran unopposed for 6 yrs, now the Dems are looking into all his shenanigans & he's refusing to cooperate. Of course, he looks like he's hitting the booze again.
2007-03-20 11:52:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Because there is nothing wrong with what he did. Clinton fired conservative attorney's.
2007-03-20 11:53:27 · answer #8 · answered by Fly Boy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course they would have just like they have most all the other things the people of america should have expressed outrage over.
2007-03-20 19:26:49 · answer #9 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course.
2007-03-20 11:49:56 · answer #10 · answered by insert name here <--------- 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋