Serious offer but it has to follow its weight and still be consistent with biblical teaching. I will read your responses and send you an email if you can actually prove it. However, I doubt this will happen.
2007-03-20 11:36:25 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
first off
Evolution is real....get used to it
secondly how could you compare a scientific fact to the bible when the book of genisis says the earth was made in a week and gode made adam with magic? It's impossible, safe bet.
One can prove evolution to you, but you can't equate it to genisis. And your an idiot if you think it's even possible. And besides belief in evolution doen't mean a lack of belief in god.
It'slike me asking you to prove man has walked on the moon but your answer has to be consistant with the story of jonah and the whale. Also one is fact the other is fiction.
Your either a zealot nutball with no sense of reality or you just wanted to see your name on the internet...post this somewhere where you can get a debate, people have genuine questions in the math and science catagory.
2007-03-20 11:47:12 · answer #1 · answered by Justin H 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not even evolutionists say humans evolved from MONKEYS . Humans and monkeys have a common ancestor.
Assuming that God (Yahweh, Jehovah, Jah, LORD) created everything, his "designs" were based from the simple to the complex and each stage evolved from the one before and was an improvement of the former.
That is why scientists are now able to have an orderly classification and why monkeys and humans have so many similarities.
2007-03-20 11:57:11 · answer #2 · answered by springday 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
evolutionists don't believe that humans evolved from monkeys. they have looked at all the evidence, genetic, archeological, biological etc and developed a theory that we evolved from a common ancestor. that theory is what is believed to best explain the evidence.
there is no way to *prove* it.
the bible says two different things. in genesis one, it just says that 'god created humankind' it doesn't give any indication how. in genesis two, it says that he 'formed man from the dust of the ground' (rsv).
1) this is not incompatible with evolutionary theory. *everything* is made up of the same components, the same basic elements. human beings are made of the same stuff as the dust of the ground. it's where we came from, it's what we're made of. before there was any kind of life, there was just 'the dust of the ground'...
2) there is no way of *proving* that god made human beings. it's just a story written in a book, that lots of people happen to believe. like it or not, believing in it doesn't make it *true*. you are perfectly entitled to believe that the genesis story is a better explanation for our existence than evolution, but evolutionists are just as entitled to believe that their theory is better.
i'll tell you what. i'll give you £50K if you can *prove* to my satisfaction that the account of creation in genesis is true...
and don't bother with all the intelligent design or creationist science stuff. i've heard it all, and it's still just theory, or, more often, just pointing out the incompleteness of the evolutionary theory. it's not *proof*.
2007-03-20 14:25:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
and that i will award $5,000 (i'm not fortunate adequate to have extra i can spare) to absolutely everyone who can teach i've got eaten a sandwich at any time in my existence formerly January 1st of this year. because of fact something isn't actively verifiable, does not advise it did not happen and is not way plenty extra probable than any option... how many previous occurances will we've that we certainly can without postpone teach?... Now how lots of those are over 500 years in the past?... None?... nicely, what approximately around 2000 years in the past?... What, you could not without postpone that something you think of exceeded off then exceeded off?... Now, you assume us to checklist to you a right away lineage previous a shadow of a doubt from around 10,000,000 to a hundred,000 years in the past?... looks ridiculous to me. i can even although point out that that's particularly probable that I even have interior the previous eaten sandwiches, and that's overwhelmingly probably that people have a elementary ancestor with monkies, and all animals for that count, proving those to somebody who believes in any different case isn't mandatory.
2016-11-27 01:30:47 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Monkies is not a word, and evolution does not say that we evolved from monkeys. We have a common ancestor. I doubt that someone who cannot even spell correctly has one hundred grand to shell out.
2007-03-20 11:40:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
I can only prove that human did not evolve from monkeys
2007-03-22 21:07:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's good you asked us all to prove something that is not true.
We didn't evolve from monkeys. Monkeys, Apes, and Humans all evolved from something earlier.
Now you can save your money.
2007-03-22 08:54:19 · answer #7 · answered by William 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The word is spelled monkeys and I think that you just proved the point. Give yourself a hundred grand.
2007-03-20 11:46:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Humans did not evolve from monkeys. They only share a common ancestor.
2007-03-20 11:54:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your money is safe, because everybody with a brain cell knows we didn't.
You posting this question means you do not, therefore, have a brain cell, but are just a thick creationist.
PS The plural is monkeys.
2007-03-20 11:44:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋