I was found guilty of speeding and I'm thinking about appealing. My basis for appealing is that the following:
1. The judge admitted evidence from a LIDAR-LASER device.
2. LIDAR-LASER does not have judicial notice in my state (Wisconsin). Country-wide, LASER does not have judicial notice in 95% of any other state either. However, the judge said it DOES have judicial notice - but he's wrong. I objected to admitting laser evidence without the support of an expert witness on laser and he overruled me.
3. The judge admitted the laser evidence even though the cop testified that he did not test the device for accuracy against any moving objects. I objected as to foundation, but like all my other 20-30 objections in trial, he overruled me.
I think this is a strong basis to show that the judge doesn't know what the hell he's doing and I'd like to appeal. My concern is that appealing is expensive, and I can be forced to pay some costs if I loose (even more if frivolous)
2007-03-20
11:20:11
·
5 answers
·
asked by
mukwonago53149
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
The cost of doing an appeal will run me $500-1,000 if I do it myself. The ticket is for 6 points and a $265 fine. However, my insurance rates will go up drastically.
By the way, I'm a good safe driver. I do not believe I was driving unreasonably fast and I'm confident in my innocense, but that isn't enough. I'm wondering if I can do it based on the info above. Also, this could set a precedent for my state. Laser is bad and this judge was a crook.
2007-03-20
11:55:45 ·
update #1