Why is it that the U.S. occupation in Iraq is still being called a war?

Question

I find it upsetting that every news outlet I see calls it a war, yet there is no opposing force. I read that we are fighting terrorists, but you can't fight terrorists with an army. That is a function of police on all levels. This occupation is nothing more than the U.S. army trying to police Iraq.

Answer 1

It is a war. There is a civil war in Iraq between Sunni and Shia militants. The US is tangential to the whole conflict.

But yes, I agree, terrorism can't be fought with military action. In the UK we tried in Northern Ireland for most of a century. It got us nowhere.

Answer 2

As somebody before suggested, no this is technically no longer an "profession." yet, with regard to what that comparable guy or woman suggested, i might infrequently evaluate their government that 'passes their very own rules' valid. it rather is a puppet government set up with the help of the united states. this is the closest factor to an profession the united states has performed in an exceedingly lengthy time, although. in keeping with the others at right here complaining concerning the "liberal b.s." i might merely desire to declare which you rather have not got any theory what you're speaking approximately. you do no longer must be liberal to work out right here: a) George W. Bush LIED! Saddam replace right into a foul guy, yet he had no longer something to do with 9/11. there have been no WMDs. there replace into no explanation for us to attack Iraq (nicely, there replace into, besides the fact that if it replace into in elementary terms a self-serving explanation for Bush and his cronies) b) This conflict would be infinite! except somebody or some people (i.e. Congress) step in and halt it. do no longer respond lower back with some crap approximately "shrink and working" the two, on account this is merely greater of the invoice O'Reilly-form rhetoric that gets no longer something efficient performed besides. c) Our popularity as a international ability is shot! No u . s . in the international immediately respects the united states like they did 6 years in the past. Our u . s . has replace into the butt of jokes, the objective of mass grievance and the scapegoat for others' problems (sure, terrorists at the instant are emboldened and are recruiting many new young little ones to their reason via strikes of our administration). thank you for examining ;)

Answer 3

yes you are right its not a war , its occupation ...war means armed hostalities between the nations while this is one sided thing and don't fit into the category ! there are no terrorists even......becuase Army is only handling the civil Iraqis.......and infact making their lives difficult !sorry to say !Civil war in Iraq has started now so it can't be the cause of 'war'.....the fact is that this illegal occupation of a country is titled with a legal term of "war" !

Answer 4

Fighting happens. Military is involved. Hence in the minds of most people, that's war. But you are completely correct.

The legal defintion only becomes directly relevant when people try to argue about legal issues, like formal declarations of war, statutory war powers, and similar things.

Answer 5

It's called a war because occupation sounds bad. It's like "collateral damage".

Answer 6

Thank you Peeps...

for pointing out the fact regarding this matter.

it's not a war.. it's an occupation that the Iraqi people do not want...

Answer 7

Because there is still a "civil war" under it all.

Answer 8

What a bunch of semantic nothing.

people are dying everyday. Its a war.

Answer 9

Hey peeps, pass the kool-aide will ya!

Answer 10

Old habits die hard.