Should they not be exterminated?
2007-03-20 10:27:12 · 16 answers · asked by the_skipper_also 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They are human, what they lack is rationality or a basic value of human life. This is what happens when you put all your stock into the belief of a posthumous immortality.
Objective moralists like them and the extreme Christians who can't keep their irrational religious beliefs to themselves have no place in society.
2007-03-20 10:32:29 · answer #1 · answered by Zenrage 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Those insurgents are still humans, no matter the horrific choices they make. They are sickeningly ignorant, using children in their murders, but that does not justify extermination of a group of people, not even a single person. Murder is murder, no matter who pulls the trigger or for what reason. The end result is the same, another human life is taken needlessly, and that makes those who kill "terrorists" morally equivalent to those child murderers..
2007-03-20 17:35:45 · answer #2 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's why most countries and cultures have some form of death penalty for mass murderers. Because regardless of anything else, the killing of children is usually criminal without any excuse.
But be careful to distinguish terrorists, who do the things you mention merely to cause fear and chaos, from insurgents who are fighting against an invading and occupying force.
War causes deaths. Including the deaths of children. That's tragic, but it's inherent in the process. Innocents get caught in the crossfire. But, those fighting against and invading and occupying force are different than those who attack others for no reason at all.
2007-03-20 17:31:48 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Exactly as the humanity that America brought to Iraq,Killing at least 65000 innocent,also America exported Democracy to Iraq through its puppets who will not last there,,,so the American history really really really served humanity with all types of weapons,,,,,,What humanity u r talking about and your country is the reason of this bloody war....go and take a hike
2007-03-20 17:43:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd be careful if I were you! We have blown up many Iraqi's during the war, murdered others, and starved to death at least 1/2 million Iraqi children under 5 with our blockaid!
They have killed a lot less than we have, and they are in a civil war! One that we have no business being in!
2007-03-20 17:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they don't, and yes they should. But atrocities are commited by both sides in any war. No country is innocent, and it certainly isn't for the government of a nation which commited the My Lai atrocity, amongst others, to make moral judgements.
2007-03-20 17:30:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Does Abdul really believe that the U.S. targets innocents as much as insurgents? Innocents always seem to be insurgents' targets.
2007-03-20 17:32:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
As much as a pilot who fires a rocket into an occupied apartment building in the middle of the night.
2007-03-20 17:31:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Abdul Hassan you are a real piece of work - there aren't two sides to this question.
2007-03-20 17:31:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes they should and so should the Americans and British who do the same.
2007-03-20 17:31:18 · answer #10 · answered by sean x 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋