More that didn't fit in earlier post on the goals set by the American Communist Party in 1963. What do you think?
Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.
Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."
2007-03-20 10:07:12 · 15 answers · asked by Whootziedude 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."
Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture.& Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.
Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
2007-03-20 10:08:39 · update #1
Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].
Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.
Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.
Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.
2007-03-20 10:10:42 · update #2
Yeah they definitely have the public schools....
I think you're on to something.
We need to fight back.
I've been saying for YEARS that Macro and Micro should be taught in public schools - if you did that for a generation there would be no economic liberals left.
Alas, today's youth cannot SPELL Schumpeter.
2007-03-20 10:33:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The chilly conflict might want to no longer be received in the overall idea of prevailing or dropping, it might want to in undemanding words be lost. the accurate of the chilly conflict replaced into finished got here therefore of economics. The Soviet Union replaced into unable to generate adequate products interior its empire to keep up their monetary equipment because providing the straightforward needs of existence to their satellites replaced into over. as a outcome, elements of the empire evolved more beneficial capitalist economies and a a lot less tyrannical authorities with regards to their electorate. commerce became their savior. Poland replaced into the first to take this street, and the Soviets were unable to quit them militarily because the fingers race had negated any Soviet technique of trading, because they could pay the costs mandatory to have trading companions.
2016-12-02 07:34:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yikes, you just scared me.
When you put it that way it looks like the cold war ended because everybody switched sides.
The Eastern European block is now more Laisez Faire than the Western Hemisphere.
2007-03-20 10:15:47 · answer #3 · answered by zaphodsclone 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, we won the Cold War.
But the Communists/Socialists have captured the Democrat Party.
It's the Communists within our own country that will destroy us & freedom.
2007-03-20 10:12:49 · answer #4 · answered by wolf 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, we didn't win, the Soviet Union collapsed, leaving only us standing. I guess you could consider it a win by default, or a technical knock out, or a disqualification?
2007-03-20 10:12:38 · answer #5 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A Ha the Republicans!
2007-03-20 10:12:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wow - why do you need commies to do damage to the US when the world can read your stuff here? The commies could not do as much damage to the US in twenty years as you just did in a few short paragraphs!!!
2007-03-20 10:11:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. The Kremlin just moved to the White House. For all we know, Cheney might have been dead for 5 years and they just haven't told us.
2007-03-20 10:13:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
"we" didn't win anything - the cold war was a fabrication of the ruling party, who then revised history to make it seem as if one of their own single handedly dismantled the entire Soviet Union.
you question, therefore, is without merit or substance, unless of course you are making the analogy that the Republican party and their secretive, Stalinesque government are similar to the Soviets
2007-03-20 10:12:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Whoa. Dam.n Liberals through and through
2007-03-20 10:10:46 · answer #10 · answered by Lynn G 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋