"The airplane was rampant with germs" Does this sentence make sense? Or should the sentence be, "Germs ran rampant in the airplane"? Does the first sentence make sense at all? Or are both sentences acceptible?
2007-03-20 09:53:41 · 8 answers · asked by ihaveissues 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
In my opinion I feel both sentences sound fine. They both make sense and are punctuated properly with correct use of grammar. I am an English major so feel confident. Take care
2007-03-23 13:01:26 · answer #1 · answered by carly071 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are acceptible but the second one makes more sense.
2007-03-20 09:57:07 · answer #2 · answered by Tenn Gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Germs ran rampant through the plane" Sounds much better than "in"
2007-03-20 09:57:54 · answer #3 · answered by Kenster102.5 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both are acceptable, but the second one sounds better.
2007-03-20 09:56:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, both sentences make sense.
2007-03-20 10:03:13 · answer #5 · answered by Solstice 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i admire this one greater effective 'technology is had to comprehend each and every thing from the planets in area to the fish in the sea' the plural of fish is fish, merely like the plural of moose is moose occasion: I even have one fish, yet my pal has 3 fish.
2016-10-19 04:44:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the second one
2007-03-20 09:56:16 · answer #7 · answered by StarLyssStar* 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
im not sure but the second one sounds better
2007-03-20 09:57:24 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋