Will history view them like the World War II Germans. Who will we explain this to our children?
2007-03-20 09:51:03 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes.
We, the people, could have risen up and stopped the worst stuff, if we'd really wanted to.
2007-03-20 09:54:49 · answer #1 · answered by catrionn 6 · 4⤊ 6⤋
sure, Obama is likewise to blame of conflict crimes, no longer each and every of the comparable crimes yet conflict crimes besides the fact that if. Afghanistan has replace right into a conflict without objective or objective and that for the duration of itself is a criminal offense. He is additionally to blame of torture (even although he inherited the crime) because of the fact he might have been sluggish to act and hence, torture happened on his watch, which makes him no much less to blame than Bush. i don't be attentive to if he's to blame of rendition, so some distance as i be attentive to it continues to be happening so he's additionally to blame of that. he's inquestionably to blame of civilian bloodbath as all of us be attentive to it continues to be a ordinary occurrence. he's an adjunct after the certainty to all the Bush administration crimes because of the fact he has actively suppressed criminal pursuit and in keeping with risk maximum repugnant of all are the crimes he has yet to commit yet will in all probability initiate this coming Tuesday while he escalates an already criminal conflict for in elementary terms self-serving cynical political applications. you're incorrect that Obama has "replaced little or no" - with the help of my reckoning he replaced the single technicality of ultimate Guantanemo, so i might evaluate something alongside the strains of "replaced almost no longer something in any respect" somewhat greater precise.
2016-10-19 04:44:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stupidity and mental blindness, is not illegal. I know you don't agree with me on this, but I still have to say no, because they have been brainwashed, and they can only see what they have been brainwashed to believe is there to see. . The rest they filter out. Just like the story about the man who was hypnotized, and under hypnosis, he was given the suggestion that when he comes out of his trance he will not be able to see his daughter. So, the hypnotist stood his daughter right in front of him, and asked him if he could see her. He could not see her standing right in front of him, and he said no. The hypnotist stood right behind the daughter, and asked the man what the hypnotist was holding. The man said it was a watch. The hypnotist ask if the man could see the inscription on the watch, and the man read the inscription on the watch. He was told that he would not be able to see his own daughter, and he was not able to see his own daughter, but he was able to see what was behind her. Moral guilt is a whole different story, but you can't legislate morality!
2007-03-20 18:39:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry, when you refer to "sheeple" you are talking about liberals cause they are the only ones stupid enough to spout BS like these crime things without any proof what so ever!
EDIT:
From the looks of all they thumbs down on conservative posts is a proven FACT that you liberals are "sheeple". You have been asked many times to come up with proof of crimes and you still don't have a single one that would ever stick but yet the sheeple liberals still seem to put the thumbs down on those posts.
Face it, liberals are the worst sort of sheeple!
2007-03-20 11:04:46 · answer #4 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Tin Foil alert time.
The Democrats are delusional, they don't have anything to offer.
Plenty of blame, but at the end of the day, they offer no solutions to real problems.
Useful legislation is not passed by crying wolf, even if the sheep are dead.
Personally I hope they keep this up and then they will once again be in the minority,
2007-03-20 15:33:21 · answer #5 · answered by Duh 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I'm afraid so. I have to admit I'm a little bit resentful that ideas that I was villified for holding 3-4 years ago are now mainstream and espoused by white men in dark suits on CNN. I sort of feel like people who couldn't see the truth back then deserve whatever they get. Sorry.
2007-03-20 09:56:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
History will view the libs like the Nazi sympathizers of WW2.
America will be seen again as having to bail out the Europeans for burying there heads in the sand till it was too late.
Why were so many European countries, except England, taken over during WW2?
What would have become of England if the US stayed out of Europe and just fought Japan, the country that killed less of us on Dec. 7 than on Sept. 11.
2007-03-20 10:08:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Zero War Crimes. Zero Gas Chambers, Zero Concentration Camps =
ZERO COMPARISION TO WORLD WAR II GERMANY
2007-03-20 10:02:41 · answer #8 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No. Not in any legal sense.
With very few exceptions, the federal criminal laws that Bush has broken make it illegal to order certain activities, and usually also to perform the actual illegal acts. Anyone else collaterally wouldn't be guilty just because their co-worker broke the law.
2007-03-20 09:56:35 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The old cliche or adage: "I was only following orders"; is no ease to the conscience, morality or ethics. An enabler is just as guilty as the addict.
2007-03-20 09:57:43 · answer #10 · answered by Swordfish 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Crimes in your twisted liberal mind, maybe. Get over it.
2007-03-24 01:09:11 · answer #11 · answered by edward m 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋