Killing flies with sledge hammers, is that the tactic? Pretty inefficient.
2007-03-20 09:02:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The problem with that is it will spread wit the winds to other countries. To say what we have for power is an under statement, everyone knows the power of the U.S. but they also know the mind set of the U.S..
No nukes will every be used again unless it came down to be attacked and the loss of the Americas. This will be the only time you will ever see or think of seeing nukes by the U.S..
2007-03-20 09:06:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by AFIN 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
How will that accomplish anything in the long run? Do you not understand the damage caused by a nuclear blast? All it shows is a capability of arrogance and violence. If we set off a nuclear bomb, do you honestly believe it would stop there? Most likely it would set off WW III. Why don't we concentrate on winning through conventional methods, They would work if we quit tying the soldiers hands behind there backs, and gave them the equipment, military intel, training, and support that they need.
2007-03-20 09:08:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Political Enigma 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because if we did nuke a particular place other countries might not take too kindly to that. We go and nuke a place then other countries see that we did it so why can't we. They start doing the same thing and pretty soon we have nuclear wars on our hands.
2007-03-20 09:10:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by j 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
First, if they give women and children 72 hours to leave, don't you think the insurgents would leave too?
Second, America does not condone the killing of innocents, and that is what would happen if this was done.
Third, It would absolutely destroy our reputation in the Arab world, and further infuriate terrorist networks
Fourth, Other countries might then launch retaliatory attacks against the US
2007-03-20 09:05:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by greencoke 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
1 of the purposes of the U.S nuclear arsenal is to deter any attacks from nations unfriendly to the U.S. To use that arsenal in a sheer powerdemonstration like you suggest, would be the same as to kill flies w/dynamite. A rather idiotic & stupid way of missusing it. It would also lead to severe complications for the U.S.
2007-03-20 09:19:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Liberals have no interest in disbanding the military any more than Neo-Cons want to destroy it through over extension and pointless adventuring. They each want to use it in different ways. You don't seem to really have any idea how the Liberals want to use it, nor the damage being done through Neo-Cons over-using it.
2007-03-20 09:08:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Blackacre 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What is it going to achieve to nuke a deserted place?
You want to show your muscles to religious fanatics, you want Iran to work on its nukes even faster.
Beware of not nuking your own troops though, geography is not really your strongest point.
2007-03-21 21:54:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because we pander to the peace wackos.
We either need to end it or leave.
2007-03-20 09:02:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Duh 3
·
0⤊
3⤋