English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It's hard to choose i know but I want ur openion!!! and if u can spend one day with one of them who would u pick?!

2007-03-20 08:51:23 · 8 answers · asked by hima 1 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

8 answers

I would Go with ED GEIN
Searching the house, authorities found

* severed heads acting as bedposts in the bedroom;
* skin used to make lampshades and upholster chair seats;
* skulls made into soup bowls;
* a human heart (it is disputed where the heart was found; the deputies' reports all claim that the heart was in a saucepan on the stove, with some crime scene photographers claiming it was in a paper bag);
* a face mask made out of real facial skin found in a paper bag;
* a necklace of human lips;
* a waistcoat (which he called a "mammary vest") made up of a vagina and breasts stitched together;
* other items fashioned from the parts of human bodies, including a belt made from nipples.


you cant do nothing worst than that even if u tried!!!!!!

2007-03-20 10:49:27 · answer #1 · answered by Nothing_tolose 3 · 1 3

They run about neck and neck. HORRIBLE crimes! Ed Gein was found to have murdered a few women. He made a skin suit for himself after his mom died, and he paraded around his property at night wearing it. The skin came from recently deceased females, some of whom he had shot to death. He also had made bowls from skulls, a belt studded with nipples and labia lips painted gold. These were just SOME of Gein's trinkets at home..... Albert Fish had killed several people and eaten them. The problem is - he was known to be a liar, and it is uncertain how much of his crime was true. He had lured his victims, stripped them, strangled them and ate them. It didn't matter if they were children or not - he even loved eating specific parts of their bodies! (Like the butt!) GROSS. Both men died in prisons.
As far as spending time with them, I suppose I'd have talked to them while they were incarcerated, to try to understand how they became that way.

2007-03-20 08:58:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

It replaced right into a guy in Peru it truly is undemanding to have killed over three hundred. The figures are unknown in a lot of countries. also, the FBI places human beings in 'serial killer' catagory which signifies that some gang bangers are serial killers in spite of the undeniable fact that, they ought to kill for the exhilaration of it. Ed Gein "in undemanding words" killed 2. some thing else were dug up. Albert Fish is unknown yet is suspected in about 15. Killing blacks back then replaced into no longer investagated heavily yet he did confess to killing a black boy. The worst American, in idea, has Henry Lucus in spite of the undeniable fact that that's suspected that he confessed and provided to take cops to the burial web content yet maximum imagine he replaced into mendacity.

2016-12-02 07:29:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Fish, hands down. Fish was also much more deviant to the living; betraying the trust of the family of the little girl he murdered was bad enough (said he was taking her to a birthday party), but then to write them a letter about how he ate a part of her is atrocious. In addition to the people he killed, he boasted that he had molested over 100 children.

Gein was a ghoul, but at least he did his the harvesting of skins to make his "woman suit" and rapes post-morteum.

I would not want to spend even one minute of one day with either one of them when they were alive (both are deceased).

I would also have to agree with the above poster that Dahmer was likely worse than both of the above as he tried to turn some of his victims into "living" zombie sex slaves and would drill holes in their skull then pour a chemical like Drano to kill part of their brain.

2007-03-20 09:10:31 · answer #4 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 5 1

Both were pretty awful. Personally though I find the BTK guy most fascinating. He was such a cold son of a *****, I'd love to pick his brain and figure out how he thinks, mainly because its just so foreign and different from my mindset, I'd just want to see if I could understand it.

Dahmer was pretty insane as well.

And its not like its a competition. I mean, both did horrible things, theres no need to have them compete for who was worst. The lesser of two evils is still evil.

2007-03-20 08:57:00 · answer #5 · answered by Jesus W. 6 · 1 1

Mammary Vest

2016-10-29 04:51:35 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Spend a day with them, good grief, I'd be their dinner. No way. Studied both cases in criminology, Fish was by far the worst. IMHO

2007-03-20 08:54:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Gein was worse.

I'd like just 10 minutes with both of them.

2007-03-20 08:54:26 · answer #8 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers