What is more important: our troops safe at home or saving face in spite of the facts in Iraq?

Question

simple question - the war cons say "support the troops"
the rest of America says "we support our troops - bring them home NOW"

so tell me - is it logical to say that you support the troops if you want them to stay in country to face possible death and disfigurement?

I think those who actually SUPPORT the troops are the ones who are pushing and screaming to bring them home alive and as soon as humanly possible.

It takes more courage to admit to a mistake than it does to continue on making things even worse.

Answer 1

Simple. Our troops safe at home. Sadly, control of government in the eyes of the Iraqis should be controlled by the victors of the sectarian violence, not the elections. Our soldiers shouldn't be the mediators in a never-ending INTERNAL conflict where loss of life and limb is a daily possibility. Let U.S. soldiers and U.S. tax dollars come back to the U.S. where DOMESTIC issues can be placed at the forefront rather than neglected like it has been for the past four years.

Answer 2

Now that the USA and the UK are there and dedicated to getting Iraq to some resemblance of stability we need to stay and complete to work.

If we don't or won't then all of the terrorist horror scenarios that we were told existed when we invaded (which didn't) will exist as external forces outside of Iraq will use the sectarian violence there as a testing ground for techniques and use it as a black market to trade weapon.

I was against the war in the first place. Wrong war at the wrong time - but now that we are there - we MUST finish the job. No more Vietnam or Somalia legacies should be hanging over our head - if we commit ourselves to a nation we can't pull out just because it get's too hot in the kitchen.

If the war is being badly run - then fire the people running it. Remove the constraints on the forces there and get the press OUT of Iraq. Let our soldiers do their jobs as they were meant to do it (hey everybody, war is hell) and then let's bring them all home with parades and victories and not the personal hell of knowing the job wasn't completed.

Answer 3

You statement makes no sense. It is like saying that you support your football team so you pull them off the field an make them forfeit the game.

You, sir, are a phoney. You could not care less about the troops. You and your democrat cronies want to insure that America looses this war just so you can gain political points. Every time this ridiculous point about supporting the troops by undermining them is made the democrats damage themselves a little more.

America sees that you are more concerned with winning elections than protecting America and her interests. It is beginning to dawn on people that the insurgency in Iraq would have collapsed long ago if the democrats put their unconditional support behind the president. The insurgents are hanging on until President Bush is out of office. If another Republican is elected they will give it up. If a Democrat gets in they will be absolutely convinced that America does not have the stomach of extended conflict. Heaven help us!

Answer 4

Well, let's keep it simple. If our troops weren't in Iraq, they would be stationed somewhere else in the world. Traveling is a big part of a career in the military. They knew this when they enlisted. I have 2 cousins, a brother in law, and an uncle, who are all marines and currently serving in Iraq. I support them and their fellow soldiers and I support the war and their mission because I want them to achieve victory so they can come home as soon as possible. But not until the mission is accomplished that way our soldiers don't have to go back in another 10 years.

Answer 5

You make it seem that there are the two choices that you mention. Pick one or the other.
How about - - - - is it more important to bring our troops home or have them stay until Iraq is stabilized ?
An all-out war for power in Iraq could easily turn into a war that would make all preceding wars look like picnics. Perhaps you would prefer that to keeping the troops there a little longer.

Answer 6

they gained't go domicile until eventually the warriors retire, quits or dies. they'll the two get sent to do different initiatives (at the same time with Afganistan and perhaps Sudan) or sent decrease back to their base. opportunities are high Iraq will wreck up into 3 factors and no one would be keen to offer up until eventually the over 500,000 knowledgeable Iraqis make certain Iraq ought to be one us of a. as a techniques because of the fact the aliban and Al Queda go in Afganistan, that's extra of a flow now than a company. Key leaders are lifeless and there is not any formal corporation now. Commanders with funds can truthfully do despite they choose very resembling the warlords that are nevertheless in Afganistan. The meant substantial commander boasted numerous 4,000 adult men that's down from 10,000 adult men he boasted with regard to the top of ultimate 3 hundred and sixty 5 days. Recruits are many times mentally ill and or undesirable so triumphing their hearts and minds will in all probability be ineffective. a lot of it is all spooky shadow stuff. in spite of everything a million million Africans die each and each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days from malaria and basically approximately 60,000 individuals die each and each 3 hundred and sixty 5 days from automobile injuries. in accordance to the CIA actuality e book, Germany and Italy the two had two times the death value in step with a million,000 than Iraq in 2006 and France, Japan and the U.S. additionally had bigger death expenditures in step with a million,000 than Iraq in 2006.

Answer 7

Bring the troops home. So we can have more 9/11s on our soil.
It hard to resolve problems of people that have fought for 1000 years, but i rather keep troops there than fight them here.

Answer 8

I see different facts in Iraq I guess. Most people join the military to blow things up. They all know they have the chance of being blown up to begin with. Do you think the soldiers who have lost friends in this war, or who have lost a limb want to know that we cowered, tucked our tails between our legs when things got a little rough. These colors do not run. Remember those bumper stickers, or have you forgotten. That is what our soldiers live for.

Answer 9

Pushing to bring the troops home is AGAINST the troops. US forces in Iraq are fighting a battle that once won will mean far fewer US forces will die in the battle against the Jihadists.

Answer 10

It's to late to save face, bring our troops home.