Has anyone else heard that Sky Sports news, Sky news and Sky Three are being axed from freeview? Cheeky Eh?

Answer 1

They are replacing them with pay-channels. Only much use if you have a freeview box that will accept the cards they will be selling. If, like me you have Freeview built into the tv then
you're losing 3 channels.

Answer 2

The big guns of the British television industry are lining up to strip BSkyB of its stake in Freeview, the free-to-watch digital TV service led by chairman Tom Betts.

The BBC, ITV and Channel 4 are to tell Ofcom, the media regulator, that Sky should forfeit its shareholding in Freeview if it is allowed to replace its free channels on the digital platform with pay-to-view channels.

Sky wants to remove Sky News, Sky Sports News and Sky 3 from Freeview and replace them with four pay-to-view alternatives. But to do so it needs Ofcom to approve a change in its Freeview broadcast licence. Sky will submit its application to Ofcom in the next few weeks.

An executive at one Freeview shareholder said: "If Sky doesn't have any free channels on Freeview, then clearly it will have little in common with other stakeholders in Freeview that support the principle that UK consumers should have access to as wide a range of free-to-view digital TV channels as possible." Sky declined to comment.

Ofcom could refuse Sky permission to alter its Freeview licence. In an announcement last month, the watchdog said it would consider whether the proposed change would "unacceptably diminish" the variation in the channel line-up on Freeview. It will also examine whether "a reduction in the current range of free-to-air channels would be compensated for by the proposed introduction of the new pay-television channels".

It added that it would be assessing "the effect of any change to existing licence conditions and/or the need to include any new licence conditions to ensure fair and effective competition for the benefit of consumers".

The united opposition to Sky's plans to ditch its free channels on Freeview is another sign of the escalating tensions between the satellite broadcaster and the other major UK broadcasters.

Sky is already engaged in a war of words with Virgin Media. The cable TV group stopped carrying Sky 1 and 2 after the satellite broadcaster demanded it pay more for the entertainment channels. Virgin claimed Sky was asking an unreasonable price. For its part, Sky said that Virgin should recognise the additional investment it had made in the channels.

Along with the Office of Fair Trading, Ofcom is also examining whether Sky should be permitted to keep the 17.9 per cent stake it has acquired in ITV. Virgin Media, whose largest single shareholder is Sir Richard Branson, claims the satellite broadcaster made the move in order to stop it making a bid for ITV.

thats what i've heard (this is an extract from bbc news)

Answer 3

As SKY make investments so heavily interior the EPL their concentration is going to objective there, not everywhere else. If the SPL/ SFA had taken the £80+ million on supply some years in the past, then there could be extra coverage. yet those whizzes being the insightful real promoting and marketing bods that they are regarded a recent horse interior the mouth and suggested: "No thank you our sport is saturated in money, so take your princely sum someplace else". Me, cynical? you ought to declare that specific.

Answer 4

yea its not good have to go to sky to get the channels back

Answer 5

Where have you been?

This was announced after they removed them from Virgin Media

There being removed and aint coming back

Answer 6

yeah apparantly it goes off end of march!!