Even the left-wing militarycity.com admits it. It's time for these Chickendove Liberals to enlist and fight for a change, rather than have Republican kids do all of the fighting, right?
http://www.militarycity.com/polls/2003_chart2.php
2007-03-20 04:51:49 · 16 answers · asked by Jessica J 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
golden,
You must be clueless. Are you saying that you believe Liberals have enlisted in greater numbers over the last 3 years? LOL. It's probably more like 2% Liberals now--if that.
Jessica, Educator of YA Idiots
2007-03-20 04:57:13 · update #1
Once again.
You might want to check your facts on who supports the war and the way it is being fought. Check out your source from your previous posting of this question, the conservative militarytimes.com. You will see that your figures and stats are a little off. You might learn something if you bother to read the posted link.
2007-03-20 05:01:15 · answer #1 · answered by Think 1st 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
You are maliciously misrepresenting non or anti RedsStaters.
First the US Census Bureau states America only has 120,000 registered liberals.
At most liberals represent .0025% of the population.
For a Change why don't you go to the DOD web site and look at the military demographics. The majority percentage come from California.
California is the most populated so it makes sense that thy would have the most service personal. But California also has the most bases and the most Navy ports of any State.
That does not make the Army Blue But it does guarantee a non Red sector.
Go big Red Go
2007-03-20 05:12:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I know lol they keep claiming "I DONT BELIEVE YOU SITE YOUR SOURCES" and then when you do theyr like THE REPUBLICAN COMMANDERS RIGGED THOSE NUMBERS. Theres no winning against a group of people who lie and flip flop on their beliefs almost hourly. Just drop it, all the true americans know that these left wing girlymen, as Schwarzenager would call them, have always been afraid of fighting for their country cause its easier to just smoke pot and crack and have huge music festivals that they believe are somehow changing the world. Its ok, if evolution is correct these people will just eliminate themselves from the gene pool.
Edit:
Ok im going to scare the libs, here we go : THE DRAFT HAS JUST BEEN RE-INSTATED, HURRY FLEE TO CANADA!!!!!!!
2007-03-20 05:02:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
why should people who do not believe in murder become trained killers?
you seem to not be understanding something here.
and I doubt that statisic. I think 7% claim a liberal stance or democratic party affiliation, but moderates and other people who don't fall in either side of the spectrum may just list them selves as right-wing or other
2007-03-20 05:03:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The poll is from 2004, it is 2007. A poll from perhaps 2006 would better support your argument. How do you know it hasn't changed?
Edit: Sweetheart, I never stated my opinion, I just asked why you didn't have more current information? You are reading more into my statement than was intended simply to prove your own point to your question.
From a personal note my mother is a Lt. Colonel and my brother is a PFC, and my brother enlisted in 2005. Both identify as democrat (democrat and liberal are not necessarily synonyms) and both do not believe that the war in Iraq is justified but both understand that they can serve there and will do so.
2007-03-20 04:54:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Wait, how does joining the military fight for change? Usually during wartime, those who enlist are going to be those in support of the war effort, while those we are against the war effort do other things. Being in the military doesn't allow for you to voice your opposition. Therefor, it makes sense to me that most military people would identify themselves as right-wing.
Also, the term chickenhawk, or chickendove as you put it, refers to someone who fully supports a war. Most liberals don't.
2007-03-20 04:57:44 · answer #6 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
They are against the war. Why would they fight? They only say they are for the troops to avoid getting their butts kicked. They know that the troops chose to be in the military. They know that there are enlistees getting ready to go to Iraq right now, and they also know those soldiers are republicans!
2007-03-20 04:57:43 · answer #7 · answered by panthrchic 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Personally, I believe it shouldn't matter what political party those in the military belong to. They're supposed to fight on behalf of the nation, not on behalf of some partisan platform. And if they're not, then they aren't doing their job.
2007-03-20 05:00:39 · answer #8 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
you're like a broken record. This question has been asked 10 times. You never listen to the answers. But for everyone else reading this who might take you seriously, active duty troops are to reamin in rank and apolitical, so none of them are allowed to have political affiliation. And what's with tangerine? Another one of us who isn't intrersted in you so you have to act out like a child? Stay in school, and pray your daddy always takes care of you.
2007-03-20 05:04:51 · answer #9 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sorry, the libs believe this is the 2nd coming of the summer of love. They are basking in the glory of what was the counter culture.
2007-03-20 04:56:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋