Dalton's Atomic Theory
It was in the early 1800s that John Dalton, an observer of weather and discoverer of color blindness among other things, came up with his atomic theory. Let's set the stage for Dalton's work. Less than twenty years earlier, in the 1780's, Lavoisier ushered in a new chemical era by making careful quantitative measurements which allowed the compositions of compounds to be determined with accuracy. By 1799 enough data had been accumulated for Proust to establish the Law of Constant Composition ( also called the Law of Definite Proportions). In 1803 Dalton noted that oxygen and carbon combined to make two compounds. Of course, each had its own particular weight ratio of oxygen to carbon (1.33:1 and 2.66:1), but also, for the same amount of carbon, one had exactly twice as much oxygen as the other. This led him to propose the Law of Simple Multiple Proportions, which was later verified by the Swedish chemist Berzelius. In an attempt to explain how and why elements would combine with one another in fixed ratios and sometimes also in multiples of those ratios, Dalton formulated his atomic theory.
The idea of atoms had been proposed much earlier. The ancient Greek philosophers had talked about atoms, but Dalton's theory was different in that it had the weight of careful chemical measurements behind it. It wasn't just a philosophical statement that there are atoms because there must be atoms. His atomic theory, stated that elements consisted of tiny particles called atoms. He said that the reason an element is pure is because all atoms of an element were identical and that in particular they had the same mass. He also said that the reason elements differed from one another was that atoms of each element were different from one another; in particular, they had different masses. He also said that compounds consisted of atoms of different elements combined together. Compounds are pure substances (remember they cannot be separated into elements by phase changes) because the atoms of different elements are bonded to one another somehow, perhaps by hooks, and are not easily separated from one another. Compounds have constant composition because they contain a fixed ratio of atoms and each atom has its own characteristic weight, thus fixing the weight ratio of one element to the other. In addition he said that chemical reactions involved the rearrangement of combinations of those atoms.
So that, briefly, is Dalton's theory. With modifications, it has stood up pretty well to the criteria that we talked about earlier. It did not convince everyone right away however. Although a number of chemists were quickly convinced of the truth of the theory, it took about a half century for the opposition to die down, or perhaps I should say die off.
Let me point out again the difference between a model of atoms and a theory of atoms. A model focuses on describing what the atoms are like, whereas the theory not only talks about what the atoms are like but how they interact with one another and so forth. Dalton's model was that the atoms were tiny, indivisible, indestructible particles and that each one had a certain mass, size, and chemical behavior that was determined by what kind of element they were. We will use that model of an atom for now, but we will modify it considerably in a later lesson.
2007-03-20 04:47:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dalton's Atomic Theory had five main points:
1) Elements are made of microscopic particles called atoms.
2) Every atom of a particular element is identical to every other atom of that element.
3) The atoms of a given element are different from those of any other element.
4) Atoms of one element can combine with atoms of other elements to form compounds. A given compound always has the same relative numbers of types of atoms.
5) Atoms cannot be created, divided into smaller particles, or destroyed in a chemical reactionl; it only changes the way atoms are grouped together.
These statements are largely correct. It should be noted that individual atoms can be changed by nuclear fission or fusion, but these are not chemical reactions. In addition, all atoms of a given element are not strictly identical, because they may have different numbers of neutrons if they are different isotopes.
However, Dalton's theory also contained a significant error. He believed that when two elements were known to form only one compound between them, it would be a binary compound, or 1:1 ratio, unless an outside cause acted on it. For this reason, he incorrectly believed the chemical formula of water to be HO instead of H2O.
2007-03-20 04:49:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by DavidK93 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Home
Dalton's Atomic Theory
It was in the early 1800s that John Dalton, an observer of weather and discoverer of color blindness among other things, came up with his atomic theory. Let's set the stage for Dalton's work. Less than twenty years earlier, in the 1780's, Lavoisier ushered in a new chemical era by making careful quantitative measurements which allowed the compositions of compounds to be determined with accuracy. By 1799 enough data had been accumulated for Proust to establish the Law of Constant Composition ( also called the Law of Definite Proportions). In 1803 Dalton noted that oxygen and carbon combined to make two compounds. Of course, each had its own particular weight ratio of oxygen to carbon (1.33:1 and 2.66:1), but also, for the same amount of carbon, one had exactly twice as much oxygen as the other. This led him to propose the Law of Simple Multiple Proportions, which was later verified by the Swedish chemist Berzelius. In an attempt to explain how and why elements would combine with one another in fixed ratios and sometimes also in multiples of those ratios, Dalton formulated his atomic theory.
The idea of atoms had been proposed much earlier. The ancient Greek philosophers had talked about atoms, but Dalton's theory was different in that it had the weight of careful chemical measurements behind it. It wasn't just a philosophical statement that there are atoms because there must be atoms. His atomic theory, stated that elements consisted of tiny particles called atoms. He said that the reason an element is pure is because all atoms of an element were identical and that in particular they had the same mass. He also said that the reason elements differed from one another was that atoms of each element were different from one another; in particular, they had different masses. He also said that compounds consisted of atoms of different elements combined together. Compounds are pure substances (remember they cannot be separated into elements by phase changes) because the atoms of different elements are bonded to one another somehow, perhaps by hooks, and are not easily separated from one another. Compounds have constant composition because they contain a fixed ratio of atoms and each atom has its own characteristic weight, thus fixing the weight ratio of one element to the other. In addition he said that chemical reactions involved the rearrangement of combinations of those atoms.
So that, briefly, is Dalton's theory. With modifications, it has stood up pretty well to the criteria that we talked about earlier. It did not convince everyone right away however. Although a number of chemists were quickly convinced of the truth of the theory, it took about a half century for the opposition to die down, or perhaps I should say die off.
Let me point out again the difference between a model of atoms and a theory of atoms. A model focuses on describing what the atoms are like, whereas the theory not only talks about what the atoms are like but how they interact with one another and so forth. Dalton's model was that the atoms were tiny, indivisible, indestructible particles and that each one had a certain mass, size, and chemical behavior that was determined by what kind of element they were. We will use that model of an atom for now, but we will modify it considerably in a later lesson.
Top of Page
E-mail instructor: Eden Francis
Science Department
19600 South Molalla Avenue
Oregon City, OR 97045
(503) 657-6958 x2807
TDD (503) 650-6649
Distance Learning questions
Clackamas Community College
©1998, 2002 Clackamas Community College, Hal Bender
2007-03-20 04:49:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dalton's concept had 4 significant postulate: a million. All matter is made up of tiny indivisible debris observed as atoms that may't be created nor destroyed. 2. Atoms of one element can't be switched over into atoms of yet another element. In chemical reactions, atoms merely recombine in distinctive places to variety a clean compound. 3. Atoms of one element are comparable in mass and properties and are distinctive from atoms of the different element. 4. Compounds effect from the chemical blend of a particular ratio of atoms of distinctive aspects. immediately all of us be attentive to that for the duration of a million. atoms are divisible (electrons, protons, neutrons, or perhaps worry-loose debris). yet they're the smallest unit to keep the properties of the element. Atoms can't be created nor destroyed this is the regulation of Conservation of Mass. 2. isn't thoroughly genuine because of the fact nuclear reactions effect in distinctive atoms. yet we settle for his postulate concerning the rearranging of atoms in chemical reactions. 3. isn't genuine because of the fact of isotopes of aspects yet we do settle for that the size and properties of atoms from one element selection from atoms of alternative aspects. 4. is genuine ninety 9% of the time. some compounds could have very fair transformations in atom ratios. wish this helps and isn't any longer too difficult.
2016-10-19 04:09:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by seabrooks 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
copy and paste ;) to get 10 pnts
2007-03-20 05:35:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋