2007-03-20 03:59:01 · 28 answers · asked by Mister 609 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Probably no better at all. I would really be surprised is it got more than 40% on Rotten Tomatos
2007-03-20 05:17:24 · answer #1 · answered by chocobocharmer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well dude, take it this way, John Cena might lack the moves and talent when he wrestles but he is young and a good looking guy, you cannot deny that, plus the fact that he does have fans puts him close if not even to Stone cold. (even if they are eight year olds, if the kids want to see the films, thats 3+ tickets sold per kid actually since the parents accompany the kid)
Now, about Austin, he does rock at wrestling and has a large fanbase but still he isn't that young to actually act as a mainstream hero in a film, but he is doing that, it wont attract a lot of people. So what I believe is that Cena's movie will dominate Austin's movie in terms of earnings.
Another point I'd like to emphasize here is the fact that WWE should NOT have let Austin appear in front of the crowd before the release of the film BECAUSE people were wanting to see Austin, and they would even have bought tickets for that but WWE put him on PPV and now on Wrestlemania and that just... kills the excitement and curiosity factor.
Also as far as the stories are concerned, I heard Austin's movie is just a glorified remake of some Japanese film, and Cena's movie story was pretty much original.
Conclusion: Cena's movie will end up being the better one, in terms of money grossing, storyline and performances.
2007-03-20 04:18:50 · answer #2 · answered by Casper 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a Cena fan but I think Stone Colds movie will be better.
2007-03-26 04:55:30 · answer #3 · answered by railfanalways 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're two different genres. Stone Cold's is more of a horror movie and Cena's movie was an action movie. So you really can't compare them to each other.
2007-03-25 04:15:47 · answer #4 · answered by Amy C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Condemned is almost like Japanese' battle royale remake with convict fight for life in an island (Battle Royale had either highschool or college students fight for it) I think it has the chance of making more money (Marine made just about 27 million in both theater and DVD) because i think there are higher fanbase for Stone Cold than John Cena.
2007-03-20 04:03:25 · answer #5 · answered by Ming P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmm still have not seen Cena's movie but the plot line of it is one that has been done a million times over. 1 man against all odds blah blah blah to save his wife. the plot of the rattlesnakes movie is a little more original. and up with the times. a bunch of death row inmates being hunted for sport and entertainment of the masses, the ones that survive for 30 hours go free. sounds pretty cool. i only hope they actually throw in a "he almost makes but gets killed at the zero hour" twist at the end. i just like to see the bad guy win every now and then. it keeps it fresh.
2007-03-20 04:33:41 · answer #6 · answered by big_john_719 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hoping it is better than Cena's, Austin more experienced in front of the camera with the TV show he did. Go Rattle Snake
2007-03-20 04:03:13 · answer #7 · answered by MD67 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I haven't seen the marine but when Austin came out on The Longest Yard he was a pretty good actor! So I think I'm going to watch his movie!
2007-03-20 05:10:30 · answer #8 · answered by ♥**Me**♥ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cena movie was the worst i have seen for a long time, i seen it last night and it was boring, cant judge on stone colds movie yet can we, but im sure it will be just as bad,
watch cenas movie for free here http://www.peekamovie.net/all-videos-p2
2007-03-20 05:22:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Marine looked good in previews but IT SUCKED SO much stone colds looks better
2007-03-20 08:25:32 · answer #10 · answered by Big Show Save_Us.222 2nd coming 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stone colds looks like its got more action
2007-03-27 23:01:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋