English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Anyone seen an interview anywhere or any info on the child, Brown, who was the namesake for the Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education?

2007-03-20 03:46:53 · 2 answers · asked by sam 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

2 answers

The child was Linda Brown (now Thompson).

There was a program on PBS in 2004, but I can't remember the name of it. You might be able to find it on PBS's website.

According to the following website:

http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itdhr/0999/ijde/pitts.htm

"Linda Brown Thompson, now 55 and still living in Topeka, is reluctant to discuss her experience and her father's role in challenging the system, partly because she feels too much emphasis has been placed by the media on her, to the exclusion of the other 12 plaintiffs in Topeka. Her sister, Cheryl Brown Henderson, executive director of the Brown Foundation for Educational Equity, Excellence and Research, agrees with Charles Scott, Jr.'s assessment. "We are very proud of what our father did," Henderson says. "But it is important not to oversimplify the Brown case -- not to forget the attorneys, the other plaintiffs in Topeka and the plaintiffs in the other states who eventually were included in the Brown case."

2007-03-20 04:07:46 · answer #1 · answered by bottleblondemama 7 · 0 0

The magnificent courtroom's Brown v. Board of coaching determination did not abolish segregation in different public areas, which includes eating places and restrooms, nor did it require desegregation of public colleges by using a particular time. It did, even although, declare the permissive or mandatory segregation that existed in 21 states unconstitutional. It became a massive step in the direction of finished desegregation of public colleges. Even partial desegregation of those colleges, even although, became nonetheless very some distance away, as might quickly become obvious The landmark magnificent courtroom case of Brown v. Board of coaching (1954) settled the question of besides the fact that if or not blacks and whites can get carry of an coaching integrated with or break away one yet another. The case overturned the 1896 case of Plessy v. Ferguson, which wide-unfold the doctrine of "separate yet equivalent." this thought stated that separate public centers of equivalent high quality do not violate the equivalent risk-free practices clause of the Fourteenth modification of the form.

2016-11-27 00:37:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers