Poll: Who did more to destabilize Iraq....Abu musab al Zarqawi or George W. Bush?

Question

I vote Zarqawi..........hands down

beheading videos, suicide attacks, attacks on policie stations, attacks on civilians, attacks on military, suicide cement truck attack on UN head quaters, attacking the Shia mosque and knocking all the gold off of it, this guy was a modern day arch super villian from Al-Qadea, he's almost dead a year, and the consequences of his actions are still being felt,

Answer 1

Without question it was Zarqawi. I never refer to him with the "al" preface, because the "al" means "the great".

Having lived in Iraq from 2003-2005 I got to know a lot of Iraqi people. They always praised and thanked Bush, but condemned zarqawi.

Bush definitely disrupted their lives with the invasion, but he did rid the country of a blood thirsty tyrant. Zarqawi and his band of cut throats continues where Saddam left off.

Answer 2

I am fascinated by people who think that Saddam was actually OK. He used chemical weapons against his own people and killed anyone who made a peep so if you feel that he was really a good influence in the area then you really should be moving to the Middle East where that form of government is for you. Zarqawi and Al-Quida are foreign fighthers (just like US troops?) who have some pretty severe plans for the population of Iraq who has lived a secular life for many years. For anyone who thinks that Saddam hunted down terrorists needs to remember that he funded state terrorism, gave sanctuary to wanted terrorists from all over the world and allowed the operation of terrorist training camps within his borders. If you live in the US and have arrived at a point in your life where you think Saddam was a good guy then you need to sit down and think about how far out of whack you are with your nation and democratic governments and the concept of human rights. The US wants to leave the area and Al Quida wants to come in (from the outside, its not a domestic organization) and take over the country to impose the same form of murderous, oppressive government that existed in Afghanistan and to use the oil wealth of the nation (not for the people bubby) to fund more terrorism throughout the world. Zarqawi is the villain in the piece, the rest is just nutty liberal politics in the US.

Answer 3

al Zarqawi. If left alone without the interference of the jihadists Iraq would be well on the way to self governing self sufficiency. They would have electricity and clean water. Too bad they can't see that.

Answer 4

Zarqawi.

Funny, I see people "want this war to end", but they don't realise it never will. This has been going on since before G.W. Bush and it will go on after him. The only question is where. Check your history.

Answer 5

enable's see - ask your self and awe - a bombing marketing campaign at the same time with a minimum of 1700 sorties one hundred fifty,000 US squaddies marching on the main substantial cities and occupying them disbanding of the Iraq military and police dismantling of the Iraq economic gadget - last the government factories, and banks, scrapping the Iraqi forex dismantling of the government inclusive of the seize of lots of Saddam's officers dismantling of the paperwork and many the college gadget whilst all Baath social gathering contributors have been fired dismantling of the food for oil food distribution gadget bombing of the electrical powered grid from which the rustic has nevertheless no longer recovered ok. enable's learn this to Z's beheading video clips and various of different terrorist assaults which began in spite of everything of the above.... Gosh, i won't be able to come to a end as to who did extra to destabilize Iraq.

Answer 6

Zarqawi. Bush is acting to STABILIZE Iraq.

Answer 7

Definately al Zarqawi...destabilization was his primary goal.

Answer 8

Ronald McDonald

Answer 9

It's close but the credit goes to Bush.
As bad a tyrant as Saddam Hussein was, he pursued terrorists and prevented them from doing what Bush's insane pseudo-religiously motivated re-beginning of the Iraq War I has permitted them to do--to pose as 'defenders" of Near easterners against western aggression.
Our quarrel in that region is with pseudo-religious mass murderers and power-seekers, not the backward or the westernized citizen. By permitting these deeds Bush's incompetent and ridiculous attempt to use weapons in a war of ideas has permitted and encouraged the crazies, who under a dictator were seen for what they were--foreign provocateurs, and something equally as bad or worse than their home-grown ruling monster.

Answer 10

i agree with zarqawi