Bush/Cheney supporters would you remove both of them from office if it would mean victory in Iraq.?

Question

Bush supporters if you could choose ONLY one of the two options below and it would happen, which would it be.

Option A: Bush and Cheney just disappear. Leaving Speaker Of The House Nancy Pelosi as President. The fighting stops in Iraq. The Kurds, Sunnis, and Shiites immediately make peace. They all decide to do what Bush/Cheney always wanted them to do. Al Quada decides to leave the country. Basically anybody that is causing trouble for the U.S. agenda is no longer a problem. The U.S. has won the war !
Option B: Bush and Cheney remain as President and Vice President until their term is over. What will happen in Iraq remains to be seen. Just as it is today.

Well, which would you choose ? Show me your courage. Pick one or the other. No cop outs or trying to have it both ways.

A Balrog, the answer to your question is YES. I would accept Condoleezza Rice as President for victory in Iraq.

Laptec60, we are not talking about reality here. This is hypothetical.

garyb161, you misunderstood the question. FIRST comes peace, THEN comes Pelosi.

Garrett, the same with you. FIRST comes peace, THEN comes pelosi. Geez, come on guys, is the question that hard to understand ?

J Marie, someone had to replace the President when he disappeared. Well, Cheney would disappear with him. So who does that leave in the line of succession ? The Speaker Of The House. Whoever that might be. It happens to be Nancy Pelosi. Who would you want it to be ? Ronald Reagan ? Come on !

Answer 1

If it meant victory of course

Answer 2

The USA should ask forgiveness for it's sins in the lands of the Muslims. I'm not a Muslim, far from it, they would see me as unclean, which may be true. America and the CIA created the problems and elongated the Mujahideen war in Afganistan to learn how the Russians would perform and how to create a Viet Nam scenario for the Soviets. Senator Charlie (horse) Wilson gave billions of dollars to the Afgan, Muslim freedom fighters, all on a romantic whim. Untold millions of dollars still lie in the hands of Muslim Mujahideen extremists, as do weapons made in the USA, like the Stinger G2A and the millions of other US Swiss and British supplied weapons. The USA should surender, admit it's stupidity in allowing one or two misguided romantics to take their revenge on Russia through the Mujahideen. I'm English and have hated the muslims, but I have been enlightened. Given the choice of siding with the likes of the CIA or the Muslims, I would convert and give them my heart for the right reasons, just as Senator Charlie Wilson did, for all the wrong reasons. Whenever I raved on about the Muslims it was a gut reaction. I'm British, but I have long ago moved away, MI6 was almost as idiotic as the CIA, they got hundreds of thousands of Muslims killed, just so they could watch the Russians as they wared with Afganistan, they should have left them alone, if they had done so none of the insanity of twin towers, or all the other attacks, would have occured. And so your question would not be. Have the CIA been disbanded? They were created because of the Iron Curtain, which has been drawn open! Time to point the finger at the real idiots, those who wish to leave their mark, those who created the Muslim problem in the USA and in Britain. How does one change from Church of England to a real religion?

Answer 3

They do not know anything about the issue, or about becoming informed. They proved this by re-electing Bush in 2004 and by continuing to support him in spite of all the evidence. Every non-partisan Middle East expert in the world predicted that the most likely outcome of removing Hussein from power would be a civil war and further destabilization of the region.

Even Bush’s own father, in his 1998 book ‘A World Transformed’, warned that invading Baghdad would produce the exact disaster his idiot son has created; and his own Secretary of State at the time, Colin Powell, told Bush ‘if you break it [Iraq], you own it [the mess]’.

Answer 4

If you could make it all happen that exact way that would be grand and I would say remove them both.

But my problem comes then with Nancy being in command of my country. She would be 10 times worse for this country then President Bush. I wish the war was over. There is more to being President then that. I Would much rather have President Bush presiding over domestic policy then Nancy-wouldn't socialism be grand-Pelosi.

Answer 5

We wouldn't need to. If it would mean in immediate victory in Iraq, Bush and Cheney would be perfectly willing to step down.

They've made sacrifices in regards to their personal reputations before, for the good of the US, and they would do so again, given the opportunity.

But I would choose A. It's worth suffereing two years of Pelosi as president, for peace in the middle east.

Answer 6

What scary options. IF you left out Nancy's role it would be a no brainier but I fear the day she gets in the white house because she is an idiot but given the rest of the scenario think I would have to say bye to Bush and friends. We have had idiot presidents and survived before.

Answer 7

Why stop there?
Let's toss Pelosi and Byrd into the same hole.

Would you be willing to accept victory in Iraq if it meant President Rice?

Answer 8

You sir, are a genius!
Why didn't I think of that...Al Queda will simply leave Iraq and all terrorism will just stop, and why?
Because the feared Nancy Pelosi is at the helm of course!
Why, there is no doubt that she strikes fear into the heart of every suicide bomber and child murdering extremist in the Arab world.
Why didn't we think of this sooner?

Answer 9

B. Iraq is only a battle in the war against those who who use terror for political gain. The current administration would continue the fight. The myopic Dems, such as Pelosi, would not.

Answer 10

I don't really like answering stupid hypothetical questions -- hypothetical, OK, stupid, NOT -- but I'll humor you.
B. of course...thinking of Nancy Pelosi as President is enough to gag a worm. Sorry you thought of it, even hypothetically.
Go back to your drawing board. Surely you can do better. Looking forward to your next, more reasonable question.

Answer 11

Palosi can not even get control of her own party, and magically she will bring peace...wow, the courage is on you for posting a cop out question.