How can there be Global Warming?

Question

if there is no way to scientifically measure a global temperature?

Seems this house of cards shoved down the worlds throats is beginning to collapse at the hands of scientists as they group together at the universities and are actually disproving the theory of global warming.

If the thrust of this deceit had been aimed at the USA only it would probably still be supported world wide, yet by making it global in its consequence and cost, the leaders of this inconvenient lie have failed because the rest of the world does not believe nor are they willing to pay.

Everyday another article is published by earth scientists calling the whole thing a lie.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070315101129.htm

Please read the article first comrades before you spout the party line.

goldenrae, all good points but the key one is cost effective. there is a limited well that we can go to so what goes to this cannot go to something else, pick your battles based on resource availability.

Answer 1

Correctomundo you are...the "global warming" is somewhat of a farce because of misinterpretation of scientific data --- for example "temperature calculation". Then the "theories" expand with desertification/deforestation, CO2, overpopulation and reliance on foreign oil issues tossed in for good measure.

Reading the popular media can lead a person to conclude that "global warming" is:
o- either a hoax to promote business opportunities, politicians agenda and scientists grant money.....
OR
o- a problem related to overpopulation, industrialization and fossil fuels whose solution options lie in solar power, wind power, geothermal power and nuclear fusion....

However, the correct answer may be altogether different:

NASA has released never-before-seen images that show the sun's magnetic field is much more turbulent and dynamic than previously known. The international spacecraft Hinode, formerly known as Solar B, took the images. Hinode was launched Sept. 23 to study the sun's magnetic field and its explosive energy. National Aeronautics and Space Administration scientists said the spacecraft's uninterrupted high-resolution observations of the sun are expected to have an impact on solar physics comparable to the Hubble Space Telescope's impact on astronomy. "For the first time, we are now able to make out tiny granules of hot gas that rise and fall in the sun's magnetized atmosphere," said Dick Fisher, director of NASA's Heliophyics Division. "These images will open a new era of study on some of the sun's processes that effect Earth, astronauts, orbiting satellites and the solar system." Hinode is a collaborative mission led by
the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency and includes the European Space Agency and Britain's Particle Physics Astronomy Research
Council. NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., managed the development of the Hinode's scientific instrumentation provided by industry and federal agencies.

>>> as regards alternative energy methods, I favor development of the technology for nuclear fusion using lunar Helium 3

Answer 2

If you desire to acquire provide cash for local weather study, do you feel that you'll be able to get a cheque if you happen to say," I want the provide, as I feel that I can turn out that the figures that the present paradigm is centered upon are fallacious" ? The best environmentalist, David Bellamy, has been silenced, and refused airtime. There continues to be no established causative hyperlink among the quantity of Co2 within the surroundings, and an expand in worldwide temperatures. The WWWF portraits of the polar bears swimming have been taken within the Arctic summer time; whilst the ice cap partly melts, as they could not stand up to picture within the wintry weather. The ice was once too thick! The East-Anglian uni study figures. "Oh! The figures do not fit our expectancies. Oh good. Keep quiet. Because we all know that we're correct." When the notion, and the religion is extra most important than squarely dealing with the professional doubts of plenty of non provide-supported scientists, technology has been superceded by means of devout zealots. As Oliver Cromwell colourfully stated." I pray thee, within the bowels of Christ, remember that thou mayest be fallacious."

Answer 3

I don't have to read any article that you have found somewhere and decided to post. I can think for myself. I can also look out my window and read a newspaper all by myself to see the effects of global warming. I don't need a politican, even one I respect like Al Gore to make a fantastic movie to scare the pants off of me to prove to me that we have a big problem. If you want to go along and think that it isn't a problem and want to find articles that back your findings, that's fine. But when we have no polar ice caps and when our weather continues to be as strange as it has been over the past number of years you too will find that it's a reality, and by then it will be too late to do anything. I truefully am not sure what we can do now, but by saving our natural resources and to stop polluting is a start, then we should do what little we can do.
It is not something that intelligent countries around the world are ignoring, infact, they are more afraid then we are, we have a government that does little to help. Luckily it will only be in office for 2 more years.

Answer 4

That's the beauty of academia and real science. It is constantly debatable.

The question is. If the technologies to go green are available, cost effective, just as good as the other technologies, but safer for the environment, why wouldn't one use them??

Edit: That's exactly the point with resource availablity. Working in development, a lot of our solutions were cost effective, green, and using existing and simple technologies. We have a lot of technology available and it's simple and that's what research grants are used for. What I'm also talking about is switching your light bulbs to energy efficient ones, using hybrid technology, buying biodegradable house cleaning products.

Answer 5

What difference does it make whether it is a "lie" or not and who would gain from lying about it. Listen, Rush, if we have nothing to lose from being "environmentally friendly" and possible everything to lose from not, why expend your energy fighting it? This is not a party line. This is not political. Science is above politics and religion. Why oh why is the thought that global warming does exist seen as such a hindrence to "your party"?

Answer 6

People are beginning to see this global warming farce for what it is. The truth will always win out

Answer 7

I don't open second hand emails, especially not from nuts .