Please ask the Sony Max's Mandira Bedi, Charu Sharma and Guest-panelist Ayaz Memon who did the post mortem of that match between Bangladesh vs. India.
Nobody questioned the validity of Indian defeat and after 3-days of the event I saw the only question of negative connotation challenging the fairness of the game.
India is a great nation and its people are also generally having broader minds. How come you pull their stature down with such a question? Hope you will do some eulogy by way of posting "Additional Data" in this question so that the records are set straight!
2007-03-21 06:42:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hafiz 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hey man, if each match India lost is fixed, then all matches are fixed ;-) We have a big problem to accept failures. After all it is a game - so expect a loss here and there. Another 2-3 big wins for Bangladesh and no one would even say they upset some country :-) A couple of decades ago when India won the world cup, we were (on papers) worse than Bangaldesh today - but yet no one thought it was fixed. Remember Bangladesh has beat a lot of big names earlier too and on their day, coupled with opponent's bad day, they can beat anyone. So swallow the bitter pill dear and get on with life. It is not the end of the world. Put away the kaala part in your dal and enjoy the rest of it.
2007-03-20 09:14:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by surnell 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it was not. Bangladesh played well in each and every department of the game, because of which they won. I don't think there is any need that every match that brings a surprising result should be looked at with an eye of suspicion. Daal mein kuch kaala nahi hai.
2007-03-20 09:50:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Let us not take the credit away from Bangladeshs for defeating India in the name of match fixing as I do not think that any match fixing was involved and India lost the match because they played very poorly and Bangladesh played excellently.
2007-03-20 18:03:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yup..i agree. South asian cricketers are starting to be selfish about money and not thinking about the effects that their country is loosing(fame, talent, pride). I mean India and Pakistan have fairly good players and being defeated by weaker teams is somthing to think about. How could both pakistan and India lose the matches against new/weak teams unless they were bribed to do so. Logically, this match was fixed if you think about the personality and greed that all humans have.
2007-03-20 19:42:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by annie 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
The reason India Lost because they should do field first. Because in the Begain. The pich was so hard so it's really help the pasrr Ballar from the Bangla and the Boll was go really fast so it's not easy to play.
2007-03-20 11:11:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mr.$Bad$ jatt *4rom* `Punjab` 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Its a hard reality dat India lost to Bangladesh. The match was not fixed instead our players were fixed in promos not in practice matches.
Dal saaf thi.
2007-03-20 09:08:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by HEMANT K 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No yaar Bangladesh played very well yaar...they also defeated newzealand
Saale bangladesh ne mere fav team ko haradiya hai
aur us dal ko phek do
2007-03-20 09:28:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
NO WAY. indian cricketers are one of the richest in the world. i dont think they will throw away a match for some money. They may buy some cricketers with the money they have.
http://www.cricket.indhp.net
2007-03-20 09:20:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
That was first match for India in WC07 And they all took B'Desh very lightly,any way it costed much for all of us and that's why its obvious ,these type of thoughts clicking in mind .
Hope it was not fixed .I would say DAAL GALI NAHI.
2007-03-20 13:33:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rafik s 2
·
1⤊
0⤋