2007-03-20 01:49:59 · 9 answers · asked by AKA FrogButt 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I miss her thought provoking Q's!
2007-03-20 01:50:32 · update #1
She left me a 360 voicemail saying I shouldn't smoke.
2007-03-20 01:52:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
I advise that the real decrease for contributions be performed away with, and that the utmost payouts in retirement besides the fact that if proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social risk-free practices isn't a "supply away" utility yet one that each and every physique persons contribute to love a value mark downs plan, and must be risk-free against distinctive makes use of by using applying the government. Do you settle or disagree and why? in case you're so nervous approximately it then why do now not you; first placed it shrink back into the indoors optimal sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for their very own interest, 2nd pay shrink back each and each penny you have borrowed from the two Social risk-free practices and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and persons who come over right here yet in no way paid a penny to it, and finally have it a similar for each guy or woman; in distinctive words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they want something better they do it on their very own with out the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had in no way been particularly replaced. They, a team of scholars, stated that each and each and absolutely everyone costs of interest might perhaps be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to become wealthy if needed (that should opt to be genuine additionally to taces). the ideal financial problem might perhaps be, they suggested, jointly as there have been no costs of interest. Why now not try this answer? the wealthy might besides the fact that if be wealthy. My question is: jointly as soial risk-free practices will become a difficulty regarding federal costs, why now not artwork with a balanced or earnings money and spend no better useful than is obtainable in, as any kinfolk has to objective for? Why now not ban all loobying provides with the intention to get regulations that serve the country? God bless united statesa..
2016-11-27 00:26:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She only Comes ones a year like santa clause or A really old man.
2007-03-20 01:57:30 · answer #3 · answered by Rocky The Fearless 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That makes one of us.
2007-03-20 01:52:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. But then again, I don't think I had seen her during BHM either.
2007-03-20 01:56:46 · answer #5 · answered by Jayna 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nooo I havent! I miss her too
2007-03-20 01:54:16 · answer #6 · answered by ~LAX Mom~ 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
rumor has it she's reporter girl and family.
2007-03-20 01:54:07 · answer #7 · answered by Baw 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I have not.
2007-03-20 01:58:13 · answer #8 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
she was suspended
2007-03-20 01:53:16 · answer #9 · answered by Full of Id 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋