English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

yep it does.

2007-03-20 01:38:04 · answer #1 · answered by bez 4 · 0 0

Yes, and everyone knows we should always unexpect the expected.

2007-03-20 08:39:13 · answer #2 · answered by Veruca Salt 6 · 0 0

Somehow i disagree. The unexpected wouldn't know that its been expected.

2007-03-20 08:42:42 · answer #3 · answered by Ari-ah 3 · 0 0

Well my daughter is expecting and i wasn't expecting that so i expect you could be right even though it was unexpected !!

2007-03-20 08:42:00 · answer #4 · answered by nicemanvery 7 · 0 0

No! That's just a play with words.

For example, since you don't know what to expect you can't brace yourself for the worst by thinking of what could be the worst because you are limited on what might be the worst. When in reality the worst can always be far worst than you can imagine!

2007-03-20 14:53:12 · answer #5 · answered by Lonely Bàstard 5 · 0 0

I answered a similar question some time ago. Actually, it should be said: "anticipate the unexpected".

2007-03-20 08:42:13 · answer #6 · answered by Joe 6 · 0 0

Now that's a paradox!! Well, maybe a moot point. Ok, an oxy-moron. No, an enigma. Better yet, a conundrum. You might even call it a dichotomy. No matter what you call it, it will make your head spin for a week!

2007-03-20 08:42:16 · answer #7 · answered by The Y!ABut 6 · 0 0

Yes. I got over thirty answers when I asked that same Q a couple of months ago.

2007-03-20 08:40:54 · answer #8 · answered by AKA FrogButt 7 · 0 0

Sure does but then you would expect nothing else would you .

2007-03-20 08:39:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Expect so!

2007-03-20 08:47:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ha! Just as I thought, the element of surprise....

2007-03-20 08:39:53 · answer #11 · answered by Benny Zuko, The All-Knowing cat 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers