This company that has a little more than 600 employees and has the following statistics:
29 have been accused of spouse abuse
7 have been arrested for fraud
19 have been accused of writing bad cheques
117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
3 have done time for assault
71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit
14 have been arrested on drug-related charges
8 have been arrested for shoplifting
21 are currently defendants in lawsuits
84 have been arrested for drink driving in the last year
Which organisation is this?
It's the 635 members of the British House of Commons, the same group that cranks out hundreds of new laws each year designed to keep the rest of us in line.
2007-03-20 01:34:42 · 21 answers · asked by OriginalBubble 6 in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
Sorry I don't have any sources to list and I also can't verify its true. Its just an email that has been going round that I thought was amusing.
2007-03-20 03:04:57 · update #1
You forgot to mention that close to 200 of them are considered a threat to national security and the leaders of their party's have been told not to appoint them to offices of state
2007-03-20 01:50:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i think of the great drug companies do supply many of the money to oppose legalizing pot. As somebody else mentioned, here in California the place we've scientific marijuana, the dispensaries are opposing legalization because of the fact it would harm their enterprise additionally. yet maximum politicians oppose it in simple terms for political purposes. no person desires to be considered as 'comfortable on medications', so even in simple terms admitting that our marijuana rules do greater harm than the marijuana itself is a no-no. You hear this from retired politicians who fought the tooth-and-nail against medications while they have been in workplace. there is likewise some 'comfortable intolerance' geared up into the challenge--remember pot substitute into initially made unlawful in area because of the fact it substitute into considered as a drug used usually by means of blacks and Hispanics.
2016-12-19 09:33:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being totally unbiased to any religion, but purely looking at it from a Big Business point of view.....A little bit like the absurdity that an organisation with one of the highest paedofilia accusations against their employees (Catholic Church apparently) should be allowed to decide whether or not gay couples should be allowed to adopt on the basis of their sexuality.
2007-03-20 01:51:32 · answer #3 · answered by harry_the_monk 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Does the list of misdemeanours include the CEO of the company who has been interviewed as a witness in a cash for honours probe?
As another answerer requested we really need to know where your information can be confirmed.
2007-03-20 01:49:27 · answer #4 · answered by Rainman 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Thats scary, but whats the question??? Would we work in the house of commons.........hell yeah do you know how much they get paid!!!!, and by the looks of it, if they can do it I sure has hell can too, I dont have a criminal record though, will that work against me???
2007-03-20 01:45:15 · answer #5 · answered by missy m 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wow!!!
Really??? 84 arrested for drink driving???? Surely not.
2007-03-20 01:39:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fantastic, where did you get your info from, but I am a bit surprised that none of them have been done for trafficking illegal immigrants.
2007-03-20 02:07:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
HA HA! OMG i never knew that out country can be such a bunch of s**theads!
2007-03-20 01:38:36 · answer #8 · answered by Chel1525 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG! Thats terrible. I've had to put this page on my favourites. I will be dining out on this one for ages.
2007-03-20 01:45:33 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Lmfao I'm really NOT surprised! And they use criminal records to discredit the BNP! JOKE
2007-03-20 01:37:35 · answer #10 · answered by Sir Sidney Snot 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋