If Saddam Hussein was really a criminal and killed hundreds of kurds and she'a and he deserved what he got cuz of that, then what do She'a people who kill people in the streets according to their names and families in tens or hundreds daily. aren't they criminals too and deserve what saddam got ?
2007-03-20 00:27:04 · 9 answers · asked by sam 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
He misuse his power,kill thousands and thousands of its own
Iraqi.Conquer small country like Kuwait and rob them of all their gold and treasures. destory and burn their old wells. so what you think of Sadam?
2007-03-20 00:47:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is how certain Arabic countries work. You see, the place where I live in (and soon to leave too) is based on a system of "Solve my thy self", in other words should you kill a person who is related to a certain family, then pretty much all your family (from the Grandpa to the newborn) are in peril of being killed by that family as a right, there's no Governmental Jurisdiction system till now day and is still a common practice.
However, on to Saddam's death...No. I don't think he should have been killed, in fact if he was put back things would have been much better. I mean look at the picture, soldiers going to war for what? To make some already forgotten wild place into something better? When Saddam was there, things were good because he used an Iron Fist to keep everyone in their place and order running even if that mean using a method less then friendly, but now that he's gone and the more 'democratic' people arrived, everyone went haywire with no delay and started this stupid war...
The war is pointless, Saddam should have stayed in his place to keep Iron Fist rule going and keeping people in their places...that my final.
2007-03-20 00:50:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
To a degree, yes. The major diference, though, is that Saddam ordered the killings of tens of thousands of Kurds, by himself. Not to mention that fact that Saddam took part in the torture of countless people, and several murders by his own hand before he elevated himself in the Bathe party.
2007-03-20 00:37:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Perhaps the better question and a more realistic one would be whether the United States/Bush had the right to depose of another soverign country's leader because they thought he was a bad man!
Granted Saddam Hussein was Bad but we did not have that right to remove him from power.
That would be the equivalent to some country removing Bush from power because he is an power hungry warmongering A$$!
Lo Siento!
2007-03-20 00:46:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He deserved to die in an even more insulting way, what he got was pretty nice.
But, yes the people from both sides of the conflict who carry on now, must be brought to justice under the law of Iraq.
2007-03-23 07:16:38 · answer #5 · answered by ringolarry 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
isn't thrilling in a sad tragic way .. how people will take your question and promptly accuse you of attacking the warriors ......are they completely blind as to what it really is you've written.... This conflict is Vietnam all yet all over again ... strong infantrymen lack of life for a NO strong reason... what replaced into it again ( re Iraq) .. WMD?? or replaced into it drawing close risk ??? or replaced into it a regime change?? September11th ( that had no longer something TO DO WITH SADAM) or replaced into all of it in simple terms over oil. undertaking done ? what number years later?? My heart is going out to the warriors and their households and no individual i be conscious of who's adverse to the conflict ... Hates the warriors .. all of them have the soldier's magnificent pastime at heart. such fairly some individuals i be conscious of stay in additional advantageous concern of their authorities that they fairly do of a terrorist attack. they are petrified of the rights that they are dropping below the guise of the patriot (sp) act.. they are petrified of the enemies that they believe their authorities is transforming into.... Sadam replaced into NO risk to the USA of a.( no disputing he replaced into to particular communities interior his personal people) ... yet what number circumstances have you ever examine people writing about how a lot safer they experience with out sadam... enable's in simple terms say SUCKED IN BIGTIME people.. such fairly a number of you're permitting yourselves to stay fearfully . a ploy of your authorities so that you will be prepared to do what the presidents asks in spite of means to justify HIS end. Having suggested ALL THAT .. troops can no longer in simple terms pull out of Iraq.. we instigated the regime change ( a regime that DID have stability .. also created out ot concern) it should be morally corrupt to go away the risk free unguarded. Peace Keepers are mandatory. you've requested a question which will rile many up .. there is not any ordinary answer to this
2016-11-27 00:22:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he deserved it. How far would Hitler have gone if the US did not get involved?
How far would serial killers go if not stopped? Or, Child molesters for that matter? Evil will always continue till stopped.
2007-03-20 01:47:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
get over it, he got what he deserved, his sons should have been up there with him!!!
2007-03-20 04:26:55 · answer #8 · answered by Angela C 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Anyway he is dead if you ever forgotten about it.
2007-03-20 04:58:14 · answer #9 · answered by cinabolic 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋