Not only are the Excess Contributions taxed at 6%, but you have to withdraw the money as well. So if you exceed the contribution limit by $1,000, then you would have to pay a $60 penalty for nothing, as well as an Early Withdrawal penalty of 10% depending upon how soon you withdraw the funds.
Does this make sense? I think you just need to re-read the IRS rules on Excess IRA Contributions. It seems you misunderstood what it was saying.
2007-03-20 03:34:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by rmcgee20002 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
there is not any regulation that i'm attentive to that calls for a minimum month-to-month contribution to a Roth IRA. after all, i advise looking brokerage corporations alongside with the forefront team or fidelity Investments for a Roth somewhat of a economic corporation. Brokerage corporations charge decrease prices than banks, and also you are able to make a contribution/ upload money once you want to with out month-to-month criteria, yet maximum require $one thousand or more advantageous for the initial funding once you open the account.
2016-11-27 00:19:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
John John, he is talking about the "Extra" contributions being taxed, not the legal ones.
It is not permitted, besides the tax I think there is a penalty if you don't "recharacterize" in time, so it is not worth it. If you don't want to pay much tax, why not invest in a "Tax-efficient" mutual fund in a regular taxable account.
2007-03-20 01:04:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by gosh137 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
roth is the best way to go.
it is not taxed at all if you start taking payments at 59 1/2.
once you contribute it has already been taxed.
given the debt in the u.s., tax rates are going to go up.
it is a win win way to go.
2007-03-20 00:00:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by john john 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
I think no
2007-03-19 23:50:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by sudi p 2
·
0⤊
0⤋