And how is it that a person on £18K pa pays £58 a week
2007-03-19 21:31:15 · 11 answers · asked by paul j 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Depends on how good your solicitor is, and how you've structured your remuneration.
2007-03-19 21:35:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
that doesnt sound right, a person on benefits pays about a fiver a week. The best thing to do is withdraw the claim for 13weeks then put in a new one which will be based on current salary etc Maybe its never been reviewed
2007-03-19 21:38:09 · answer #2 · answered by thebear 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It could be that the mother of the £5 child has a good salary herself whereas the mother of the £58 child has a lower income.
2007-03-19 21:40:39 · answer #3 · answered by fengirl2 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe the person on £30k was happy to lie about their outgoings, or their mistress costs more to keep. CSA has never been fair, never will be - the rich will continue to get richer and we'll pay for their kids.
2007-03-19 21:36:44 · answer #4 · answered by chillipope 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the csa is a shambles its all down to how you work the system and how good your solicitor is i had a big problem with the csa i will not go into detail but now i work in Ireland and live in England and they cant touch my earnings i paid over 20000 pounds in 4 years when the mother and her partner both had jobs they done alright out of me now they get nothing
2007-03-20 03:08:56 · answer #5 · answered by danny boy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could it be that the payments were sent when this person had a much lower income? If they have more money now then it may not apply to the judgement.
2007-03-19 21:54:22 · answer #6 · answered by Mark J 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The higher income enables the best brains to be brought in resulting in the smaller payment being made. Its all about money (money makes money)
2007-03-20 03:16:55 · answer #7 · answered by cassidy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand this either. I think it's achieved by them lying about their income. My ex husband has 2 jobs. I don't know how much he earns, but he pays 29.95 a month for our daughter.
I don't argue because we would rather starve, but that doesn't make it right.
2007-03-19 21:39:32 · answer #8 · answered by Dogsbody 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it's a budget based system?
ie - They take a % of what's left after you have paid out all expenses?
DOGSBODY 29.99 a month?
What a bum hole he is! i would wanna provide as much as possible for my kids, u did good getting rid of him girl.
2007-03-19 21:41:42 · answer #9 · answered by just-dave 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The CSA has obviously screwed up.
2007-03-23 10:40:28 · answer #10 · answered by Ollie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋