English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just wondering.

2007-03-19 20:48:42 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

8 answers

No. The big bang was about 13.7 billion years ago. The earth didn't form until about 5 billion years ago and life didn't start until about 3.8 billion years ago.

2007-03-20 01:20:23 · answer #1 · answered by mathematician 7 · 3 0

First off I believe in the Big Bang theory. I don't think I would say the Big Bang started life though. There was a gap of almost 9 billion years between the Big Bang and when life began on planet Earth.
"The Big Bang took place 13.7 billion years ago. Life on Earth, by contrast, began no more than 4.5 billion years ago. Perhaps there is a possibility that life existed elsewhere in the universe at an earlier time, but I know of no scientist who claims that the Big Bang created life."

2007-03-20 04:00:15 · answer #2 · answered by mitsugirl 4 · 1 1

The “Big Bang” is abstract hypothesis.
Once upon a time, 20 billions of years ago, all matter
(all elementary particles and all quarks and
their girlfriends- antiparticles and antiquarks,
all kinds of waves: electromagnetic, gravitational,
muons… gluons field ….. etc.) – was assembled in a “single point”.
It is interesting to think about what had surrounded the “single point”.
The answer is :
EMPTINESS- NOTHING….!!!
Ok!
But why does everyone speak about EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
common phrases rather than in specific, concrete terms?
I wonder why nobody has written down this EMPTINESS- NOTHING in
the form of a physical formula ? You see, every schoolboy knows that
is possible to express the EMPTINESS- NOTHING condition
by the formula T=0K.
* * *
Once there was a “Big Bang”.
But in what space had the Big Bang taken place
and in what space was the matter of the Big Bang distributed?
Not in T=0K?
It is clear, that there is only EMPTINESS, NOTHING, in T=0K.
Now consider that the Universe, as an absolute frame of reference is
in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests relic radiation of the Big Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change and decrease.
What temperature can this radiation reach?
Not T=0K?
Hence, if we go into the past or into the present or into the future,
we can not escape from EMPTINESS- NOTHING T=0K.
Therefore it is necessary to begin to think from T=0K.
===== ========
About the theory of the “Big Bang” is written the thick (very thick) books.
But anywhere do not write about the reason of the “Big Bang”.
Anybody does not know it.
I know.
Action, when the God opens his palm,
have named the “Big Bang”.
And action, when the God compresses his palm,
have named " a single point”.
===========================
http://www.socratus.com

==================

2007-03-20 09:05:56 · answer #3 · answered by socratus 2 · 0 1

I don't believe in the Big Bang theory - it makes no sense to me.
Something cannot be made out of nothing and even if the earth did suddenly appear when nothing exploded into something I dont think life could have originated from it.

Have you ever heard of the Law of conservation of angular momentum?
Well basically, according to this law if an object is spinning in one direction and a piece of it broke off the piece would be spinning in the same direction as the original object.
Now, why is it that not all the planets and galaxies discovered so far are spinning in the same direction. If the big bang really did happen all the planets should be spinning in the same direction shouln't it?

Just my thoughts.

2007-03-20 04:40:44 · answer #4 · answered by MB1810 5 · 0 3

Are you questioning that the Big Bang ever happened? There is a huge amount of astronomical evidence that it did. But life didn't start for a very long time afterwards until stars had formed and exploded and the ashes condensed to make our solar system and a fresh star.

2007-03-20 03:56:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The big bang was the precursor to the universe.
During it's evolution,some way the universe developed the capacity to become aware of itself.
We and other aliens are the result.
Objective life like us are the eyes and ears of the universe.

2007-03-20 09:40:25 · answer #6 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0 1

no...at the big bang there were no atoms molecules to begin with...quarks were flying about!!!!!

2007-03-20 13:08:18 · answer #7 · answered by lilmissy 2 · 0 1

maybe it did ..but the question is who made the 'bigbang' happen

i think ive made myself clear from the above sentence

2007-03-20 03:53:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers