Most of the hawkers operates either with a partner or alone, so they have little overhead to spend. Whereas the restaurants and food courts have an army of staff and the rental is a huge amount so they have to pass it on to the customers. The next time ask some intelligent questions.
2007-03-19 19:25:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cakebread 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In general, rental at Hawker centre is cheaper then Foods courts or Coffee shops, thus foods can be sold as a lower price. Of course, this exclude prime location like Newton Circle. And we certainly can't compare Hawker Centre with Restaurant.
2007-03-20 02:26:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tan D 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Firstly, it's because the rent's a lot cheaper for hawker centres than in food courts and restaurants. This is partly due to aiconditioning, location, facility upkeep,and infrastructures of the eating places.
However, I still think that hawker centre food beats that in food courts and restaurants anytime!
2007-03-21 22:07:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by m 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
hawker centre vs restaurants/foodcourts :
rental is cheaper
not air-conditioned
operates alone or with another partner/family member
lower overheads
small-scale business
2007-03-22 06:02:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Fern 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
hawker center food is cheap coz the ingrediants are cheap and are at the low end side. however its super tasty. restaurants only see for prestige now customer satisfaction.... thus they charge more due to better services. like free flow of water and etc.
2007-03-21 06:11:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by rainbow 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think it is because the quality of the food or maybe it is more about the hygienic of the food...
maybe you should think twice before you buy some foods in hawker centre...
okay???
2007-03-21 11:00:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by cocktail 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
the stall rental is much more cheaper than in a shopping centre, and normally is family business.. lower cost....
2007-03-22 22:54:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by FiaFia 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
rent is cheaper and because it is part of the overall cost then the total cost is cheaper, then prices are therefore less
2007-03-20 02:19:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by tolitstolites 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
its aight
2007-03-20 17:39:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lights Out #3 5
·
0⤊
0⤋