2007-03-19 18:18:55 · 15 answers · asked by neoconammo 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I voted.
2007-03-19 18:20:42 · answer #1 · answered by C J 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
maximum of your Q's are merely spoke back your self.Islam isn't needed by making use of a extensive majority of the worlds inhabitants.it rather is an old 'mysogonistic theory device merely like maximum different important religions.Any device that condones publicly putting 16yo rape sufferers has the two some inquiries to respond to or to be thoroughly rejected by making use of any civilised human.you won't be in a position to come back at me by making use of asserting judaism and christianity are merely as undesirable because of the fact it appears that evidently they do no longer look to be and that i'm neither of those. it is not a psychology Q besides......attempt the chip on the shoulder web site
2016-12-18 18:30:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do wonder this and having family in New York the only thing I can say is the liberals vote like a herd. DNC says vote for this one and they all line up and do it like they were told to.
Yep, vote for her so she can keep you on the welfare programs that allow you to go nowhere in life. Vote for the party that has already said it would raise taxes. Vote to run out of Iraq with our tails between our legs. Vote to socialize medicine which doesn't work, ask Canada. The list goes on.
Vote, herd, Vote!
2007-03-19 18:34:45 · answer #3 · answered by For_Gondor! 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No true liberal would want Hillary as President. They just feel they don't have much choice. I'm trying to figure out what makes the Clintons Liberals and only came up with one answer. No true liberal would have gotten into the questionable financial situation as they did. Its not the scandal, but the drive to make profits which I am referring too.
Liberals does not believe in personal gain as much as the gain of the community. True liberals, I find nobel, Hillary is obviously self serving ____.
2007-03-19 18:28:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I vote in New York, but right now I'm not living in the US. I voted for her twice and I honestly think she's done a good job as one of my Senators. Would I vote for her for President? I don't know yet. Not because I think any of the Republicans are viable--because I don't--but because I want to see who wins the Democratic primaries. I'd rather go with Obama. Also, you should learn how to spell as misspelling doesn't make you credible.
2007-03-19 18:30:08 · answer #5 · answered by tartu2222 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely..What's the other choice??
I thought Sillary was funny..and that's
something you don't often find in this
category....It made me laugh..Thanks.
Just about anything is better than what we have now.
I'd vote for a frog, before voting for Bush.
No more lies please.
We're up to our chins in Texas Bull.
At this point, we'll take someone with half a brain,
and that would certainly be an improvement.
2007-03-19 18:27:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wonder that all the time. I can see how women may feel empowered voting for a woman, but in order to do that they must be completely brainless or out of touch with the world. Senator Clinton is a phony. She says things her aides tell her people want to hear. I have read numerous accounts of her belittling and berating her staff (her anger is understandable given her husbands antics). She has no backbone. She screams when she tries to make a point because she feels that will get her noticed. She has completely turned her back on the effort to secure our borders and support our soldiers abroad. Has anyone noticed that Hillary and her liberal brethren have aligned themselves with those that want to kill us. In order for their policies to become widely accepted our soldiers need to die and our army has to lose and our country has to become overrun with illegal aliens and our enemies have to attack us. Think about that.
2007-03-19 18:26:36 · answer #7 · answered by Andrew G 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Yeah... isn't that something? And to think they voted for that drooling idiot in the White House... TWICE!!! Omigosh! Gee, golly... and by Jiminy, yuh'all! Eeeee-haaaaaah! So, wha-choo fixin' t'do, huh, Bubba? Close that thar latrine door, boy, ya-hear?
2007-03-19 18:23:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nope. I just know that it's the people who DIDN'T think -who voted for Bush & got us into a war we can't get out of. Maybe if enough of them enlist & get killed off in Iraq before the next election- that won't happen again next year. We'll see. :)
2007-03-19 18:27:24 · answer #9 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
especially if two years ago he voted for bush.
2007-03-19 21:35:18 · answer #10 · answered by ati-atihan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama 2008.
Why'd you write Sillary?
2007-03-19 18:21:47 · answer #11 · answered by Adrian 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋