how many phyla are in the animal kingdom? fungi kingdom? eubacteria kingdom? protist kingdom? What are they?

Question

Please state a reliable source where you got the info.

Answer 1

These things change all the time. Biosystematics and taxonomy changes all the time, and people always debate how to organisms. It used to just be five kingdom; now there's this three domain thing going on, and now each kingdom has been divided into more kingdoms (e.g. the protist kingdom is now sometimes split into 8 or more different kingdoms).

My 2001 textbook said that there were 35 animal phyla, but wikipedia says there are now 37. In any case, there are more than 30 phyla, but only 15-20 or so of them really matter. there are some phyla that have like 6 obscure species. If you really want all the animal phyla, then you can go look it up online (i'm sure wikipedia would work) on in any general biology textbook; there's a whole mess of them.

There are four fungi phyla: Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota.

There really isn't any such thing as the eubacteria kingdom; bacteria used to be in monera kingdom, but now they've been split into two domains (not kingdoms), eubacteria and archaebacteria. There are 20+ phyla of bacteria, but like animals, there's only a few of them that are really important and common.

Protists is intensely debated. I have no idea how many different systems from protists there are now, but it seems that most systems no longer really cares about specific levels at higher taxonomic divisions. There's tons of different types of protists out there; again only a handful of them really matter. From what i studied, they've divided the protists into more like 8 or so separate lineages of eukaryotes (e.g. alveolata, chlorophyta, rhodophyta) and just started dividing it up from there.

Answer 2

I think you are rather overestimating the ability for England to stand on its own there - the only reason its figure show a high GDP is because of the virtual wealth in the financial sector of the city of London. England would be completely reliant on other nations for ALL its energy - most notably Scotland