He kept Rummy in charge until the repubs lost big in the 06 elections. Why did he not fire Rumsfeld prior to that, allowing so many soldiers to die.
2007-03-19 18:03:19 · 12 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Okay, I give up, why?
And while we're at it, why don't you explain how DIS loyalty is a more admirable quality.
Please do not take the cowards way out with 'at least people didn't die'...we're at war. It is nothing short of a miracle how few casualties we've suffered.
There is no way to prove that more (or less) would have died with or without Rumsfelt,
Your question is the usual snide attempt to belittle Bush with vapid rhetoric.
2007-03-19 18:14:40 · answer #1 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes he does. He has big problems admiting his mistakes. Whats funny is these repubs will go around saying we need to listen to our generals. Most of which have called Rumsfeld a moron in so many words. Then they defend Rumsfeld out of the other sides of there mouths.
Republicans who defend these guys still make near to no sense to me right now
2007-03-20 01:23:27 · answer #2 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the case you mentioned with Rumsfeld, it was Rumsfeld and Cheney's idea to go to occupy Iraq. They planned this since the late 80s...
2007-03-20 02:11:04 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Friendship and party loyalty is more than the interests of the people for Bush. The US as a whole must not be sacrificed just to pay for the support given to him to become President.
2007-03-20 01:10:54 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the question reveals another factless liberal scare tactic which is typical of the left
2007-03-20 06:44:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They all have loyalty to the ideology they share.
The Project for a New American Century.
http://www.newamericancentury.org
Regardless of the cost of human life!
2007-03-20 01:10:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
its all politics. Both Rummy and Cheney showed us that you dont't have to be the president to have absolute power. In fact, both of them probably had more power than Bush, used Bush has their little *itch.
2007-03-20 01:06:16 · answer #7 · answered by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Because his concern is about money. His friends are/were helping him get away with stealing oil and money. The people dying are not important to him...
2007-03-20 01:12:52 · answer #8 · answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because when you lie and go to war you can not trust righteous people. You depend on corrupt friends.
2007-03-20 01:11:37 · answer #9 · answered by BushSupporter 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
why do far left liberals care more for the bad guys over US Soldiers?
2007-03-20 01:07:30 · answer #10 · answered by neoconammo 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋