Conspiracy theory question: Could 911 have been an inside job?

Question

Please keep an open mind and don't get angry for asking. There are websites suggesting this because 1. the crash was cleaned up immediately so no evidence, 2. Wreckage at pentagon mysterious, 3. Other crash appears to be a drone not a plane 4. The motive is to create fear and sway feelings. 5. The towers fell straight down perfectly as if demolished. 6. Questionable if the fuel on the planes was enough heat to melt and weaken the structure. Keep in mind a conspiracy theory is an un-proven fact kinda like the Iran contra before Oliver North blew the lid off it. You would never have believed that if you didn't see it on tv

Answer 1

Have you seen the movie "Loose Change?" Freaky stuff.

Answer 2

1. people don't like to see ugliness in the spot where the center of capitalistic worship just stood
2. if it has to do with the government or anything near the government it will end up being mysterious in some way
3. there are many types of drones, some are human and some are robotic while others are mathematically inclined
4. creating fear was not the problem it was igniting the fear that had to done and all someone has to do to sway opinion is make front page headlines
this was a bit of overkill though
5. the planes were too small in mass to shove the building into toppling over
6. if you understood chemistry you would know that once most of the materials in that building hit points of chemical reaction you would know that the only thing that would stop that fire is a lack of oxygen gas, fuel, or heat
but because most of the reactions would be largely exothermic heat would not be lost
this leaves oxygen gas which would be constantly replenished with each collapse from floor to floor
the fuel is what killed the biggest part of fires as it was used in the reactions or never got heated enough
also you can put time in on the factoring which in itself would weaken the structure

please put in mind that if there were a conspiracy there would have to be more substantial evidence than that to prove it

Answer 3

Here's just one item to debunk the "controlled demolition" theory that so many people put forward for how the towers fell. How did they hide thousands of pounds of explosive and miles of detonation cable inside the towers prior to the morning of 9/11? Either the explosives were put in place some time before by a small group of trusted people, or a huge crew put them in on the night and early morning of 9/10-9/11. If the latter is the case, the story never leaked?

The moment you start to pick apart these facts you list, every one falls apart, or is shown to be simply false, or a deliberate distortion to try and support the conspiracy theory.

Oh, and your contention about Iran-Contra is completely wrong. The facts were known well before Ollie "blew the lid off". What his testimony showed was the administration's blatant disregard for Congress and the will of the American people, and that they were willing to break whatever laws they thought necessary to accomplish their goals. That wasn't a surprise either, and no one had shown it to be false; it was just odd to hear a marine officer state it so bluntly.

Answer 4

I've read pretty convincing articles that say it was from the inside. The buildings were constructed to withstand heat hotter than plane fuel can burn...

I'm not saying it was or it wasn't. But a little research can reveal some interesting information. I found my information through google when I was looking for info on 9/11.

Answer 5

You are, frankly, bananas. I live in NY. The crash was not "cleaned up quickly". It took months upon months. The debris is still here, stacked up on Staten Island. The rest of your questions are too absurd to be worth answering. Learn the real facts before following some lunatic theory.

Answer 6

might you sense it needed to shield your self against unsubstantiated claims made with the help of the mentally impaired? Get genuine those are the comparable type of folk who think of Bush led to typhoon Katrina. No proff of a plane crash on the Pentagon? rather ? 2 hundred plus witnesses and all the plane debris on website isn't info adequate for you ?

Answer 7

A secret shared is no longer a secret. No, I do not believe that any conspiracy was involved.

Answer 8

Wow..... this has never been asked before.

No, it was not an "inside job"

Answer 9

No, it was not an inside job.