I think a generation is 20 years. Stay the course? We can still win? Is there any limit to our involvement.
2007-03-19 16:20:53 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
were still in the phillipines, so i think expecting any less is foolish. But hey, they are fighting al qaeda i the phillipines now
2007-03-19 16:25:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
What ever it takes.
You cannot trivialize the indiscriminate slaughter of thousands of innocent men, women and children. We cannot revert back to our policy if inaction and no effective response to the tactics of this demented ideology.
Remember, it was when we were not involved that the events of 9/11 took place. The terrorists interpreted our complacency with weakness.
I have not heard nor read of any viable alternatives - only more criticism and rhetoric. If someone has a better policy in dealing with these thugs, they should make it known instead of just belly aching about our present policies.
2007-03-20 00:00:07 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush planned on being in iraq this long. he wants an occupation, and eventually to take over all of the middle east. It must be done in order to start a new world order.
many of the attacks on mosques, etc, were us military "black ops" that were executed as an excuse to stay there.
it is "divide and conquer" that is the strategy (start a civil war)
2007-03-19 23:28:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That Soon? Cool. The Crusaders fought em for 4 Centuries. Super-Con says Stay The Course.
2007-03-19 23:25:16 · answer #4 · answered by VileBillC 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The President has always said the global war on terror would be one that lasts generations, just as the Cold War did. During the Cold War, were you one of those saying that Stalin didn't kill millions of his own people, that the Khmer Rouge didn't kill millions of their countrymen?
Was the brutality and mass-murder of Communism OK LIBS?
2007-03-19 23:34:36 · answer #5 · answered by robot_hooker 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋