Does a judge has the right to make a judgment without examining evidence from both parties?

Question

My son-inlaw is having some problems with his ex. She took him to court, her and her lawyer lied, but the judge would not even look at the evidence my son-inlaw have. he live in one state and she live in another, and does not jhave a lawyer ( can't aford one). Its seem like the judge and lawyer knew each other well, and they are taking advantage of the fact that he is not living in the same state and does not have a lawyer. I want to know if this judge has the right to do that ( make his ruling only on what the ex and lawyer says and not giving him a chance to diffent himself. He would not even let him speak. Any help will be apreciated.

Answer 1

First, in most cities any family law lawyer will know any family law judge - it is a small profession and we all try to be nice and civil with one another.

Second, it sounds like you were not actually present at the hearing but are going on what your SIL told you happened. He needs to get a legal opinion on what occurred and what his recourse is at this time. Lawyers are not all expensive. He can contact legal aid or the bar association in the county he is going to court in. They can direct him to some low cost alternatives.

Third, if a judge would not hear evidence there is a good chance there is a valid legal reason. For example, if he was trying to admit emails or recordings or tell the judge what someone said - that would all be hearsay. If he was trying to introduce letters or documents he would have to lay a proper "foundation." There are all things a lawyer can help him with. If all the evidence he tried to introduce was objected to by the other attorney for a valid legal reason - then yes the judge can rely on the only evidece that was legally submitted - even if that all came from the other party.

He needs to get a lawyer to explain this all to him

Good luck.

Answer 2

both the Dem's' and re pubs' can not often agree on some thing even at the same time as they want a similar issue. until eventually you bypass to c-span you received't see a lot coverage of 0.33 get at the same time applicants. tremendous companies make huge contributions to applicants they help,you're constrained in how a lot you may donate to a candidate in my view. companies set up committees and communities to help and fund applicants. the hot financial ruin regulations were written by ability of the banking marketplace for congress to make into regulation and it bit them in the butt. the different problem is that some human beings vote for a million get at the same time each of the time,both because they help that get at the same time each of the time and have self assurance that's the in undemanding words get at the same time to do whats correct,or they're disillusioned with the different get at the same time for some reason. both activities want it their way and could compromise some to get their way. If what I study on the information superhighway very last evening is even 1/2 real,this election received't count number besides. If we've yet another attack like 9/11 or a serious disaster earlier the elections F.E.M.A . will take administration and George Bush will develop into the real potential of authorities. If it occurs after the elections and earlier the recent president takes workplace,i don't know what's going to ensue. G.W. signed an authorities order for the continuity of authorities and F.E.M.A. will take over and droop the structure and the President might want to be the solidarity authorities. Congress and the finest courtroom will nevertheless exist yet may have little or no voice,the President has the finest say in all concerns. there replaced into also yet another website speaking about the formation of the North American Union (Canada,U.S. and Mexico forming a union like the E.U. and the U.S. structure will be lengthy gone.

Answer 3

you know sometimes thats how the cookie crumbles

its a part of the judicial systems - and no its not fair

the man always tend to lose - he needs to get a lawyer and fast - why dont he try the legal aid offices

and hey they always lie - especially if $$$ is involved

and you say wheres the justice - sorry there isnt any

any more - and especially here in Australia

Answer 4

well you can report the lawyer and the judge look on your p/c to get the paper work for it. but to tell you the truth he did need a lawyer. but you see what you can do.

Answer 5

unfortunatly this happens all of the time he needs a lawyer and fast have you looked intoleagle aid? unless he stands up for himself and tells the jus=dge that he objects and lets them know he is defending himself they will take advantadge of him either that or find a lawyer that is wiling to represent him for whatever money they win!!!

Answer 6

The Judaical system is not always just.This is a sad fact of life. I am sorry but i have no advice worth giving.